Literature DB >> 8270755

Dietary assessment of patients with chemosensory disorders.

R D Mattes1, B J Cowart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify individuals who are at nutritional risk because of taste and/or smell disorders.
DESIGN: Patients referred by a private physician for evaluation of a chemosensory complaint underwent an extensive battery of taste and smell tests, otorhinolaryngologic tests, and, in some cases, periodontal examinations and completed a dietary/health questionnaire, a 24-hour recall, and a 2-day diet record.
SETTING: Patients were interviewed at the Monell-Jefferson Chemosensory Clinical Research Center, Philadelphia, Pa.
SUBJECTS: We studied 310 patients (142 men and 168 women) with a primary complaint of chemosensory disorder. Mean age was 50.5 +/- 15.7 (range = 15 to 93 years). Normative data were provided by an additional 79 healthy control subjects (42 men and 37 women) with no taste or smell complaint. Their mean age was 48.8 +/- 18.8 years (range = 20 to 83 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Chemosensory disorder-related changes in food habits (determined by questionnaire responses), nutrient intake (analysis of 3-day food records), and body weight (self-reported). STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Analysis of covariance, followed by post hoc analysis of adjusted means with the Tukey honestly significant difference test, was used to explore group differences in nutrient intake and body weight. chi 2 Analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate relationships between variables.
RESULTS: When groups were classified according to chemosensory diagnosis, group differences were observed on global appetitive questions, but complaints were high in all groups. Approximately 65% (203 of 310) of patients had self-reported body weights within 5% of their predisorder weight, but clinically meaningful weight gains or losses were observed in each group. Patients with multiple chemosensory disorders were most likely to lose weight, whereas the incidence of weight gain was highest in patients with anosmia. Patient report of a change in eating patterns was the best predictor of weight change among the variables examined.
CONCLUSIONS: Dietary responses to chemosensory disorders vary widely and may place patients at nutritional risk. Until better prognostic indexes are identified, dietitians should query patients about disorder-related alterations in eating patterns and provide appropriate individualized counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8270755     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)92041-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  24 in total

1.  Age-associated loss of selectivity in human olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  Nancy E Rawson; George Gomez; Beverly J Cowart; Andres Kriete; Edmund Pribitkin; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Substance and tongue-region specific loss in basic taste-quality identification in elderly adults.

Authors:  Steven Nordin; Annika Brämerson; Eva Bringlöv; Gerd Kobal; Thomas Hummel; Mats Bende
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Olfactory cleft mucus proteins associated with olfactory dysfunction in a cohort without chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Frederick Yoo; Zachary M Soler; Jennifer K Mulligan; Kristina A Storck; Jensine M Lamira; Whitney N Pasquini; Jonathan B Hill; Tegan E Noonan; Brandon J Washington; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Relationship Between Poor Olfaction and Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bojing Liu; Zhehui Luo; Jayant M Pinto; Eric J Shiroma; Gregory J Tranah; Karin Wirdefeldt; Fang Fang; Tamara B Harris; Honglei Chen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Laura D Lukasewycz; James W Griffith; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Effects of ageing on smell and taste.

Authors:  J M Boyce; G R Shone
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Nitrogen dioxide pollution exposure is associated with olfactory dysfunction in older U.S. adults.

Authors:  Dara R Adams; Gaurav S Ajmani; Vivian C Pun; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; L Philip Schumm; Martha K McClintock; Helen H Suh; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  Influence of taste disorders on dietary behaviors in cancer patients under chemotherapy.

Authors:  Karla Sánchez-Lara; Ricardo Sosa-Sánchez; Dan Green-Renner; Cindy Rodríguez; Alessandro Laviano; Daniel Motola-Kuba; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 9.  Dietary interventions for heart failure in older adults: re-emergence of the hedonic shift.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wessler; Scott L Hummel; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 10.  Oral sensory nerve damage: Causes and consequences.

Authors:  Derek J Snyder; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.