Literature DB >> 8268964

Comparison of four clinical tests for assessing hamstring muscle length.

R L Gajdosik1, M A Rieck, D K Sullivan, S E Wightman.   

Abstract

Several indirect clinical tests for measuring hamstring muscle length are available, but the influence of their test procedures is not well documented. This study examined four of these tests to clarify the results relative to the testing procedures. The right limbs of 30 men were tested for: 1) passive straight leg raise (SLR) with the pelvis and opposite thigh stabilized with straps (SLR-SS); 2) passive SLR with the low back flat and, if needed, the opposite thigh slightly flexed and supported on pillows (SLR-LBF); 3) active knee extension with the hip at 90 degrees (AKE); and 4) passive knee extension with the hip at 90 degrees (PKE). A dependent t-test showed no significant differences between the angles of SLR-SS (61 degrees +/- 6.7 degrees) and SLR-LBF (62 degrees +/- 6.2 degrees). The SLR-SS and SLR-LBF angles for subjects needing pillows under the opposite thigh for the SLR-LBF test (N = 18) also were not significantly different. The knee flexion angles for the AKE (43 degrees +/- 10.2 degrees) and the PKE (31 degrees +/- 7.5 degrees) tests were significantly different (p < 0.001). Significant relationships (Pearson r) were found among the four tests (p < 0.05). The similar angles for SLR-SS and SLR-LBF and their significant relationship (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) indicated that their different testing procedures probably had a minimal influence on test results. The difference between the AKE and PKE tests suggested that the AKE test and the PKE test may represent an "initial length" and a "maximal length," respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8268964     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1993.18.5.614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  20 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent posterior thigh symptoms detrimental to performance in rugby union: predisposing factors.

Authors:  L Devlin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A new hamstring test to complement the common clinical examination before return to sport after injury.

Authors:  C M Askling; J Nilsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effects of eccentric strength training on biceps femoris muscle architecture and knee joint range of movement.

Authors:  Tara G Potier; Caroline M Alexander; Olivier R Seynnes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Time-course changes associated with PA lumbar mobilizations on lumbar and hamstring range of motion: a randomized controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Paul Chesterton; William Evans; Nick Livadas; Shaun J McLaren
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-11-13

5.  Standing and Supine Hamstring Stretching Are Equally Effective.

Authors:  Laura C Decoster; Rebecca L Scanlon; Kevin D Horn; Joshua Cleland
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  REACTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR TRAINING RESULTS IN IMMEDIATE AND LONG TERM IMPROVEMENTS IN MEASURES OF HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  Rick A Loutsch; Russell T Baker; James M May; Alan M Nasypany
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

7.  EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS OF APPARENT HAMSTRING TIGHTNESS: A CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Brittany L Hansberger; Rick Loutsch; Christy Hancock; Robert Bonser; Alli Zeigel; Russell T Baker
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04

8.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Modified Bragard Test in Patients With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Using Electrodiagnosis as a Reference Standard.

Authors:  Kaynoosh Homayouni; Seyedeh Halimeh Jafari; Hossein Yari
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-01-12

9.  The effect of warm-up, static stretching and dynamic stretching on hamstring flexibility in previously injured subjects.

Authors:  Kieran O'Sullivan; Elaine Murray; David Sainsbury
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A Prospective Analysis of the Supine and Sitting Straight-Leg Raise Test and Its Performance in Litigation Patients.

Authors:  Olukemi K Fajolu; Fabio J R Pencle; Samuel Rosas; Kingsley R Chin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.