Literature DB >> 8268085

Does carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation reduce the risk of restenosis?

R Kieny1, D Hirsch, C Seiller, J C Thiranos, H Petit.   

Abstract

Two hundred twelve eversion endarterectomies of the internal carotid artery and reimplantation in the common carotid artery were performed between January 1985 and July 1990. A total of 206 patients with stenosis of 75% or more and with redundancy and tortuosity of the internal carotid artery underwent this procedure. Cumulative mortality and neurologic morbidity were 2.4%. Forty patients died during the course of follow-up, seven of neurologic causes (17.1%). Duplex scans of 107 operated carotid arteries were obtained an average of 27.1 months after surgery. Restenosis of > 50% was encountered in three patients (1.9%), two asymptomatic patients (1.3%) with > 75% restenosis and one symptomatic patient with occlusion (0.6%). These results contrast with a 13.5% rate of restenoses > 50% (including 5.9% of restenoses > 75% and 1.7% occlusions) observed after 156 consecutive endarterectomies performed and closed by direct suture by the same surgical team in 1987 at a mean follow-up of 44 months. We believe that this technique can be used more often because the the operative and long-term risks are not any greater than those of the other methods of carotid revascularization. Eversion endarterectomy associated with reimplantation is especially indicated when the internal carotid artery is elongated, is < 4 mm wide, and occurs in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8268085     DOI: 10.1007/BF02002123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  6 in total

1.  Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability.

Authors:  D M Shah; R C Darling; B B Chang; P S Paty; P B Kreienberg; W E Lloyd; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Carotid Body Baroreceptor Preservation and Control of Arterial Pressure in Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Kotsis; Panagitsa Christoforou; Konstantinos Nastos
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-12-09

3.  A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group.

Authors:  Joseph R Schneider; Irene B Helenowski; Cheryl R Jackson; Michael J Verta; Kimberly C Zamor; Nilesh H Patel; Stanley Kim; Andrew W Hoel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  A prospective randomized study on bilateral carotid endarterectomy: patching versus eversion.

Authors:  E Ballotta; L Renon; G Da Giau; A Toniato; C Baracchini; E Abbruzzese; M Saladini; P Moscardo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  [Open therapy of carotid stenosis by endarterectomy].

Authors:  E S Debus; A Larena; Ch Wintzer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Depth of cervical plexus block and phrenic nerve blockade: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Mathias Opperer; Reinhard Kaufmann; Matthias Meissnitzer; Florian K Enzmann; Christian Dinges; Wolfgang Hitzl; Jürgen Nawratil; Andreas Koköfer
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.288

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.