Literature DB >> 32132814

Carotid Body Baroreceptor Preservation and Control of Arterial Pressure in Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy.

Thomas Kotsis1, Panagitsa Christoforou1, Konstantinos Nastos1.   

Abstract

The technique of the eversion carotid endarterectomy (ECEA), as an alternative to the conventional endarterectomy with primary or patch angioplasty, is an established technique for managing internal carotid artery stenoses and recently its application has been upgraded through the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines (Recommendation 55: Class 1, Level A). However, the typical eversion method has been associated with postoperative hypertension due to loss of the baroreceptor reflex; the standard oblique transection at the bulb performed in the eversion endarterectomy interrupts either the baroreceptor sensoring tissue, which is mostly located in the adventitia at the medial portion of the proximal internal carotid artery, or even the proper Hering nerve, a branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve. These actions deregulate the natural negative feedback of the carotid baroreceptor. Guided by the anatomical location of the baroreceptor sensor we have elaborated a slight modification of the classical ECEA to maintain as much as possible of the viable carotid baroreceptor sensoring surface. By extending the oblique incision distal to the carotid bifurcation in the medial part of the internal carotid artery stem, an eyebrow-like part of the proximal internal carotid artery is maintained and the axis from the sensoring tissue to the nerve of Hering is protected and following the endarterectomy, postoperative arterial blood pressure levels are lower than in the classical ECEA due to the maintenance of the efficiency of the baroreceptor reflex. During the period from September 2016 to November 2018, carotid endarterectomy was performed in 57 patients. Twenty-eight of them underwent the typical ECEA and 29 patients had the modified eyebrow eversion carotid endarterectomy (me-ECEA). The changes of blood pressure baseline during the postoperative course in ECEA and me-ECEA group were analyzed and compared. Postoperative hypertension was defined as an elevation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 mm Hg. Patients who underwent typical ECEA had significantly higher postoperative blood pressure values compared with those who underwent me-ECEA. Actually, the mean postoperative SBP was 172.67 ± 24.59 mm Hg in the typical ECEA group compared with 160.86 ± 12.83 mm Hg in the me-ECEA group ( p  = 0.023). The mean diastolic blood pressure in the ECEA group was 65.42 ± 11.39 mm Hg compared with 58.06 ± 9.06 mm Hg in the me-ECEA group ( p  = 0.009). Our proposed me-ECEA technique seems to be related to lower rates of postoperative hypertension compared with the typical ECEA, probably due to the sparing of the main mass of the baroreceptor apparatus; this improved modification (me-ECEA) of the typical eversion procedure could represent an alternative ECEA technique with its inherent advantages. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  baroreceptor; blood pressure; carotid body; eversion carotid endarterectomy; modified ECEA; post carotid endarterectomy hypertension

Year:  2019        PMID: 32132814      PMCID: PMC7054064          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  20 in total

1.  [Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery].

Authors:  P Kasprzak; D Raithel
Journal:  Vasa Suppl       Date:  1992

2.  Closure of the internal carotid artery after endarterectomy: the advantages of patch angioplasty without its disadvantages.

Authors:  R Vanmaele; P Van Schil; M De Maeseneer
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  P Cao; G Giordano; P De Rango; S Zannetti; R Chiesa; G Coppi; D Palombo; F Peinetti; C Spartera; V Stancanelli; E Vecchiati
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Editor's Choice - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Vaux Robertson; Athanasios N Saratzis; A Ross Naylor
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).

Authors:  A R Naylor; J-B Ricco; G J de Borst; S Debus; J de Haro; A Halliday; G Hamilton; J Kakisis; S Kakkos; S Lepidi; H S Markus; D J McCabe; J Roy; H Sillesen; J C van den Berg; F Vermassen; P Kolh; N Chakfe; R J Hinchliffe; I Koncar; J S Lindholt; M Vega de Ceniga; F Verzini; J Archie; S Bellmunt; A Chaudhuri; M Koelemay; A-K Lindahl; F Padberg; M Venermo
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group.

Authors:  Joseph R Schneider; Irene B Helenowski; Cheryl R Jackson; Michael J Verta; Kimberly C Zamor; Nilesh H Patel; Stanley Kim; Andrew W Hoel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  The modified operative technique of partial eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Richard McBride; Johnathan Porter; Haytham Al-Khaffaf
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of postcarotid endarterectomy hypertension after eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Serdar Demirel; Käthe Goossen; Hans Bruijnen; Pascal Probst; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Hemodynamic changes in Chevalier eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  M Taurino; F Filippi; F Persiani; C Tirotti; R Dito; D Brancadoro; L Rizzo
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  The Carotid Sinus Nerve and the First English Translation of Hering's Original Research on this Nerve.

Authors:  Mohammadali M Shoja; Rabjot Rai; Stefan Lachkar; Seleipiri Iboroma Akobo; Emre Yilmaz; Marios Loukas; Emanuela Binello; Mehrnoush Gorjaian; Christoph J Griessenauer; Joe Iwanaga; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-01-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Computed tomography-assessed variations of the carotid sinus.

Authors:  Radu-Andrei Baz; Cristian Scheau; Andrei Constantin Rusali; Petru Bordei
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.246

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.