Literature DB >> 8266650

Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter.

L S Gray1, B Winn, B Gilmartin.   

Abstract

The nominally steady-state accommodation response exhibits temporal variations which can be characterized by two dominant regions of activity; a low frequency component (LFC < 0.6 Hz) and a high frequency component (1.0 < or = HFC < or = 2.1 Hz). There is no consensus as to the relative contribution made by each of the frequency components of the microfluctuations to the control of steady-state accommodation. We investigate the effect of variations in artificial pupil diameter (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm pupils) on the microfluctuations of accommodation, while three young emmetropic subjects view, monocularly, a photopic high contrast Maltese cross target placed at a dioptric distance equal to their open-loop accommodation level. Average power spectra were calculated for five accommodation signals, each of 10 sec duration, collected for each viewing condition at a sampling rate of 102.4 Hz using a continuously recording infrared objective optometer. For artificial pupil diameters < or = 2 mm the power of the LFC was found to increase as a function of reducing pupil diameter, while for artificial pupil diameters > 2 mm the LFC was found to be relatively constant. No systematic change in the HFC with varying artificial pupil diameter was observed. Changes in the root-mean-square (r.m.s.) value of the fluctuations with varying pupil diameter were significant (one-way ANOVA, F = 8.507, P = 0.0001, d.f. = 89) and showed a similar form to the changes in the LFC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8266650     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90007-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Adrian Glasser; Ruth E Manny; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  [Reproducibility of subjective refraction measurement].

Authors:  H-J Grein; O Schmidt; A Ritsche
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Static and dynamic crystalline lens accommodation evaluated using quantitative 3-D OCT.

Authors:  Enrique Gambra; Sergio Ortiz; Pablo Perez-Merino; Michalina Gora; Maciej Wojtkowski; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Sensitivity of Chaos Measures in Detecting Stress in the Focusing Control Mechanism of the Short-Sighted Eye.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Matthew P Cufflin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Cognitive Demand and Accommodative Microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.