Literature DB >> 8266648

The effects of grating area and spatial frequency on contrast sensitivity as a function of light level.

J Mustonen1, J Rovamo, R Näsänen.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity was measured as a function of retinal illuminance (I) for vertical cosine gratings of various circular areas (A) and spatial frequencies (f < or = 4 c/deg). Spatial frequency and grating diameter varied in inverse proportion to each other in order to keep the relative grating area (A x f2) constant at either 3.14, 12.6, 50.3, or 201 square cycles. At all grating areas and spatial frequencies contrast sensitivity in dim light first increased in proportion to the square root of retinal illuminance. Then the increase saturated and contrast sensitivity became independent of luminance level in bright light. For gratings with constant relative area contrast sensitivity functions were similar in shape and had the same maximum sensitivity but were shifted horizontally towards lower illuminances with decreasing spatial frequency. However, when replotted as a function of retinal illuminance divided by spatial frequency squared, contrast sensitivity functions fell on a common curve at all levels of relative retinal illuminance (I/f2).

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8266648     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90005-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. II. Matching under natural viewing conditions.

Authors:  Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Electrophysiological measures of temporal resolution, contrast sensitivity and spatial resolving power in sharks.

Authors:  Laura A Ryan; Jan M Hemmi; Shaun P Collin; Nathan S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Transparency of the bovine corneal stroma at physiological hydration and its dependence on concentration of the ambient anion.

Authors:  Oksana Kostyuk; Oksana Nalovina; Turki M Mubard; Justyn W Regini; Keith M Meek; Andrew J Quantock; Gerald F Elliott; Stuart A Hodson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Straightening the Eyes Doesn't Rebalance the Brain.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhou; Yonghua Wang; Lixia Feng; Jiafeng Wang; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Spatio-chromatic contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic light levels.

Authors:  Sophie Wuerger; Maliha Ashraf; Minjung Kim; Jasna Martinovic; María Pérez-Ortiz; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Internal noise sources limiting contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Daphné Silvestre; Angelo Arleo; Rémy Allard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  On the Relationship Between Sensory Eye Dominance and Stereopsis in the Normal-Sighted Adult Population: Normative Data.

Authors:  Yonghua Wang; Lele Cui; Zhifen He; Wenman Lin; Jia Qu; Fan Lu; Jiawei Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.