Literature DB >> 8266646

The effects of adaptation and masking on incremental thresholds for contrast.

J Ross1, H D Speed, M J Morgan.   

Abstract

Using a temporal two-alternative forced-choice procedure, we measured thresholds for detecting increments in contrast of a 2 c/deg vertical grating at a wide range of pedestal contrasts, (1) before and after adapting to a grating of the same orientation and spatial frequency, and (2) in the presence of superimposed masks that varied in either orientation or spatial frequency. The adapting grating and all masks were of fixed 40% contrast. The results show that prior adaptation and concurrent masking have qualitatively similar effects on incremental thresholds; both raise threshold at low pedestal contrasts and leave them unaltered at higher contrasts. But masks have greater effects than adaptors, the effect of an orthogonal mask, or one two octaves higher in spatial frequency, being about the same as a parallel adaptor of the same spatial frequency as the pedestal grating. The results are explained by a model of Ross and Speed [(1991) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 246, 61-69] that assumes that masks and adaptors both reposition the transducer function of contrast sensitive mechanisms and that masks, but not adaptors, also stimulate the detecting mechanism.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8266646     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90003-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; David J Holmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Gerardo Viera; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A multiplicative model for spatial interaction in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Jason C Park; Jennifer Salant; Sonya Thomas; Joy Hirsch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sensory gain outperforms efficient readout mechanisms in predicting attention-related improvements in behavior.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Edward F Ester; Sean Deering; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Release from cross-orientation suppression facilitates 3D shape perception.

Authors:  Andrea Li; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.