Literature DB >> 8265095

Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a multicentre double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study. The Ondansetron and Granisetron Emesis Study Group.

P Ruff1, W Paska, L Goedhals, P Pouillart, A Rivière, D Vorobiof, B Bloch, A Jones, C Martin, R Brunet.   

Abstract

This is the first international, multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study to directly compare the efficacy and safety profile of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron (8 or 32 mg) with granisetron (3 mg) in the control of cisplatin-induced acute emesis. A total of 496 patients were randomised to receive one of three anti-emetic treatments prior to cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 50 mg/m2). Of these, 165 and 162 patients received 8 and 32 mg of ondansetron, respectively, and 169 patients received 3 mg of granisetron. Complete control of emesis (0 emetic episodes) over 24 h was reported in 59% of patients in the 8-mg ondansetron group, 51% of patients in the 32-mg ondansetron group and 56% of patients in the granisetron group. Complete or major control (< or = 2 emetic episodes) was achieved in 76 and 74% of patients in the 8- and 32-mg ondansetron group, respectively, compared with 78% of patients in the granisetron group. Nausea graded none or mild 24 h after the start of cisplatin infusion was reported in 71 and 69% of patients in the 8- and 32-mg ondansetron groups, respectively, and in 73% of patients in the granisetron group. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups when global satisfaction scores were compared. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess any interaction between treatments and prognostic factors (age, gender, alcohol use, cisplatin dose or concomitant chemotherapy) on complete or major response, but there was no evidence of interaction for any factor. All three anti-emetic treatments were well tolerated and no severe or unexpected drug-related adverse events were observed with ondansetron or granisetron. Headache, the most reported drug-related adverse event for all three treatment groups, occurred in 9% of all patients. In summary, no significant difference was observed between any of the treatment groups with respect to emesis, nausea or drug-related adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8265095     DOI: 10.1159/000227321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  30 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; E Ballatori; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  D Warr
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  A risk-benefit assessment of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in antineoplastic therapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  E A Perez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Granisetron. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Mechanism of gastrointestinal abnormal motor activity induced by cisplatin in conscious dogs.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ando; Erito Mochiki; Tetsuro Ohno; Mitsuhiro Yanai; Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Kyoichi Ogata; Yuichi Tabe; Ryuusuke Aihara; Toshihiro Nakabayashi; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Impact of guidelines implemented in a paris university hospital: application to the use of antiemetics by cancer patients.

Authors:  I Debrix; A Flahault; A Becker; L Schwartz; A Kanfer; B Milleron
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Are there differences among the serotonin antagonists?

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Using a multihospital systems framework to evaluate and establish drug use policy.

Authors:  L C Vermeulen; P A Windisch; R J Rydman; R H Bruskiewitz; D I Brixner; P H Vlasses
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Current position of 5HT3 antagonists and the additional value of NK1 antagonists; a new class of antiemetics.

Authors:  R de Wit
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.