Literature DB >> 8264607

Mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA intermediates of extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells.

W P Deng1, J A Nickoloff.   

Abstract

Previous work indicated that extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells could be explained by the single-strand annealing (SSA) model. This model predicts that extrachromosomal recombination leads to nonconservative crossover products and that heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) is formed by annealing of complementary single strands. Mismatched bases in hDNA may subsequently be repaired to wild-type or mutant sequences, or they may remain unrepaired and segregate following DNA replication. We describe a system to examine the formation and mismatch repair of hDNA in recombination intermediates. Our results are consistent with extrachromosomal recombination occurring via SSA and producing crossover recombinant products. As predicted by the SSA model, hDNA was present in double-strand break-induced recombination intermediates. By placing either silent or frameshift mutations in the predicted hDNA region, we have shown that mismatches are efficiently repaired prior to DNA replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8264607      PMCID: PMC358389          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.400-406.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  50 in total

1.  Strand-specific mismatch correction in nuclear extracts of human and Drosophila melanogaster cell lines.

Authors:  J Holmes; S Clark; P Modrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Repair of double-stranded DNA breaks by homologous DNA fragments during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells.

Authors:  F L Lin; K Sperle; N Sternberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Repair of single nucleotide DNA mismatches transfected into mammalian cells can occur by short-patch excision.

Authors:  L A Heywood; J F Burke
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Transcription stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J A Nickoloff; R J Reynolds
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Frequency of intrachromosomal homologous recombination induced by UV radiation in normally repairing and excision repair-deficient human cells.

Authors:  T Tsujimura; V M Maher; A R Godwin; R M Liskay; J J McCormick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Intrachromosomal homologous recombination in human cells which differ in nucleotide excision-repair capacity.

Authors:  N P Bhattacharyya; V M Maher; J J McCormick
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Mechanisms of DNA-mismatch correction.

Authors:  M Grilley; J Holmes; B Yashar; P Modrich
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Homologous recombination in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R J Bollag; A S Waldman; R M Liskay
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Effect of nucleotide excision repair in human cells on intrachromosomal homologous recombination induced by UV and 1-nitrosopyrene.

Authors:  N P Bhattacharyya; V M Maher; J J McCormick
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products.

Authors:  F L Lin; K Sperle; N Sternberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  22 in total

1.  Efficient repair of DNA breaks in Drosophila: evidence for single-strand annealing and competition with other repair pathways.

Authors:  Christine R Preston; William Engels; Carlos Flores
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mechanisms of double-strand-break repair during gene targeting in mammalian cells.

Authors:  P Ng; M D Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Chromosomal double-strand breaks induce gene conversion at high frequency in mammalian cells.

Authors:  D G Taghian; J A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Efficient repair of all types of single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Competition between long-patch and G-T glycosylase-mediated repair of G-T mismatches.

Authors:  C A Bill; W A Duran; N R Miselis; J A Nickoloff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A comparison of calcium phosphate coprecipitation and electroporation. Implications for studies on the genetic effects of DNA damage.

Authors:  J A Nickoloff; L N Spirio; R J Reynolds
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Elevated recombination in immortal human cells is mediated by HsRAD51 recombinase.

Authors:  S J Xia; M A Shammas; R J Shmookler Reis
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mismatch repair by efficient nick-directed, and less efficient mismatch-specific, mechanisms in homologous recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  E M Miller; H L Hough; J W Cho; J A Nickoloff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Biased short tract repair of palindromic loop mismatches in mammalian cells.

Authors:  D G Taghian; H Hough; J A Nickoloff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Efficient repair of large DNA loops in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S E Corrette-Bennett; N L Mohlman; Z Rosado; J J Miret; P M Hess; B O Parker; R S Lahue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Effects of terminal nonhomology and homeology on double-strand-break-induced gene conversion tract directionality.

Authors:  H H Nelson; D B Sweetser; J A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.