Literature DB >> 8263842

ABR frequency tuning curves in dolphins.

A Y Supin1, V V Popov, V O Klishin.   

Abstract

Tone-tone masking was used to determine auditory brain-stem response tuning curves in dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in a simultaneous-masking paradigm. The Q10 of the curves was as large as 16-19 in the frequency range 64-128 kHz. In the range 45-16 kHz, Q10 decreased proportionally to the frequency with the bandwidth of the curves being constant, about 3.5-4 kHz at the 10-dB level. Tuning curves below 45 kHz are supposed to reflect broad spectral bandwidth of the probe's effective part which is no longer than 0.5 ms, irrespective of actual probe duration. Tuning curves above 64 kHz are supposed to reflect the real frequency tuning of the dolphin's auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8263842     DOI： 10.1007/bf00197772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  22 in total

1.  Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves.

Authors:  P Dallos; M A Cheatham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Compound actionpotential tuning curves in normal and pathological human ears.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [Tonal auditory simulating curves in the bottle-nosed dolphin].

Authors:  A Ia Supin; V V Popov
Journal:  Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug

4.  AP responses in forward-masking paradigms and their relationship to responses of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P J Abbas; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensory capacities of marine mammals.

Authors:  J L Fobes; C C Smock
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Pantev
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1982

7.  AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas.

Authors:  R V Harrison; J M Aran; J P Erre
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory brain stem responses in characterization of dolphin hearing.

Authors:  V V Popov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Masked tonal hearing thresholds in the beluga whale.

Authors:  C S Johnson; M W McManus; D Skaar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory brainstem response in dolphins.

Authors:  S H Ridgway; T H Bullock; D A Carder; R L Seeley; D Woods; R Galambos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 11.205
View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 2.  Analysis of auditory information in the brains of cetaceans.

Authors:  V V Popov; A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-03

3.  Level-dependent masking of the auditory evoked responses in a dolphin: manifestation of the compressive nonlinearity.

Authors:  Vladimir V Popov; Dmitry I Nechaev; Evgenia V Sysueva; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Frequency tuning curves of the dolphin's hearing: envelope-following response study.

Authors:  V V Popov; A Y Supin; V O Klishin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.