Literature DB >> 7240567

AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas.

R V Harrison, J M Aran, J P Erre.   

Abstract

Measures of cochlear selectivity can be obtained from compound responses using tone-on-tone masking procedures [Dallos and Cheatham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 591--597 (1976)]. For the normal guinea pig, cochlear fiber tuning is sharper by a factor of 1.8 than AP tuning curves using simultaneous masking (threshold criterion = 25% N1 amplitude reduction). Anesthesia does not appear to affect AP tuning. In pathological cochleas, AP tuning is broadened by a factor of 2--3, and differences between forward and simultaneous masking curves are reduced. Tuning changes can sometimes occur without threshold elevation. AP tuning curves were obtained from humans during transtympanic electrocochleography. For subjects with near normal thresholds, Q10dB values (simultaneous masking) are approximately 2.3 at 2 kHz, 3.6 at 4 kHz, and 4.7 at 8 kHz. Using the relationship between cochlear fiber tuning and AP tuning in the guinea pig, estimates of human cochlear fiber tuning are 4.2 at 2 kHz, 6.5 at 4 kHz, and 8.5 at 8 kHz. Patients with threshold elevations of more than 30 dB resulting from cochlear deafness have AP tuning curves less sharply tuned by a factor of 2--3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7240567     DOI: 10.1121/1.385819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Frequency tuning curves of the dolphin's hearing: envelope-following response study.

Authors:  V V Popov; A Y Supin; V O Klishin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erica L Hegland; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Christopher Bergevin; Radha Kalluri; Myles Mc Laughlin; Pascal Michelet; Marcel van der Heijden; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

8.  Fine frequency tuning in monkey auditory cortex and thalamus.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Srivatsun Sadagopan; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Modulation of the masking phenomenon by the crossed part of the medial olivocochlear bundle.

Authors:  P Bonfils; J L Puel; S Orès; R Pujol
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1987

10.  Loudness recruitment: contributing mechanisms as revealed by cochlear AP measures in man.

Authors:  R V Harrison; J M Aran
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.