Literature DB >> 8263578

The analysis of ordinal agreement data: beyond weighted kappa.

P Graham1, R Jackson.   

Abstract

The weighted kappa statistic has been used as an agreement index for ordinal data. Using data on the comparability of primary and proxy respondent reports of alcohol drinking frequency we show that the value of weighted kappa can be sensitive to the choice of weights. The distinction between association and agreement is clarified and it is shown that in some respects weighted kappa behaves more like a measure of association than an index of agreement. In particular, it is demonstrated that the weighted kappa statistic is not always sensitive to differences in the observed proportion in exact agreement and that high values of weighted kappa can be observed even when the level of agreement is low. We illustrate the use of statistical models in the analysis of epidemiologic agreement data and conclude that modelling ordinal agreement data produces insights which cannot be obtained through the use of weighted kappa statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8263578     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90173-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  16 in total

1.  Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Thomas J Zhou; Don Edwards
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Reliability of self-rated health in US adults.

Authors:  Anna Zajacova; Jennifer Beam Dowd
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data.

Authors:  Tarald O Kvålseth
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Examiner training and reliability in two randomized clinical trials of adult dental caries.

Authors:  David W Banting; Bennett T Amaechi; James D Bader; Peter Blanchard; Gregg H Gilbert; Christina M Gullion; Jan Carlton Holland; Sonia K Makhija; Athena Papas; André V Ritter; Mabi L Singh; William M Vollmer
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.821

6.  A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 7.  Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.

Authors:  Aya A Mitani; Phoebe E Freer; Kerrie P Nelson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Methods of assessing categorical agreement between correlated screening tests in clinical studies.

Authors:  Thomas J Zhou; Sughra Raza; Kerrie P Nelson
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.404

9.  Pitfalls in the statistical examination and interpretation of the correspondence between physician and patient satisfaction ratings and their relevance for shared decision making research.

Authors:  Oliver Hirsch; Heidemarie Keller; Christina Albohn-Kühne; Tanja Krones; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Wheat Spike Blast Image Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Mariela Fernández-Campos; Yu-Ting Huang; Mohammad R Jahanshahi; Tao Wang; Jian Jin; Darcy E P Telenko; Carlos Góngora-Canul; C D Cruz
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.