Literature DB >> 8258543

The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.

M L Sidor1, J D Zuckerman, T Lyon, K Koval, F Cuomo, N Schoenberg.   

Abstract

The radiographs of fifty fractures of the proximal part of the humerus were used to assess the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Neer classification system. A trauma series consisting of scapular anteroposterior, scapular lateral, and axillary radiographs was available for each fracture. The radiographs were reviewed by an orthopaedic shoulder specialist, an orthopaedic traumatologist, a skeletal radiologist, and two orthopaedic residents, in their fifth and second years of postgraduate training. The radiographs were reviewed on two different occasions, six months apart. Interobserver reliability was assessed by comparison of the fracture classifications determined by the five observers. Intraobserver reproducibility was evaluated by comparison of the classifications determined by each observer on the first and second viewings. Kappa (kappa) reliability coefficients were used. All five observers agreed on the final classification for 32 and 30 per cent of the fractures on the first and second viewings, respectively. Paired comparisons between the five observers showed a mean reliability coefficient of 0.48 (range, 0.43 to 0.58) for the first viewing and 0.52 (range, 0.37 to 0.62) for the second viewing. The attending physicians obtained a slightly higher kappa value than the orthopaedic residents (0.52 compared with 0.48). Reproducibility ranged from 0.83 (the shoulder specialist) to 0.50 (the skeletal radiologist), with a mean of 0.66. Simplification of the Neer classification system, from sixteen categories to six more general categories based on fracture type, did not significantly improve either interobserver reliability or intraobserver reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8258543     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  51 in total

1.  Classifications in brief: the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Bradley C Carofino; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Mark J Jo; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

3.  CORR Insights(®): Greater Tuberosity Fractures: Does Fracture Assessment and Treatment Recommendation Vary Based on Imaging Modality?

Authors:  Donald H Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  3D reconstruction does not improve agreement and results in an increase in surgical indications in proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Raquel Marí; Marta Cuenca; Tulia Ferrer; Klaus Langohr; Fernando Santana
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

5.  Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

6.  [Marburg shoulder radiography splint (MSR splint) for standardized and high quality plain film radiography in fractures of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  M Schnabel; C Bahrs; E Walthers; L Gotzen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Reliability of the Crowe und Hartofilakidis classifications used in the assessment of the adult dysplastic hip.

Authors:  Ralf Decking; Alexander Brunner; Jens Decking; Wolfhart Puhl; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Primary shoulder arthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Dennis den Hartog; Jeroen de Haan; Niels W Schep; Wim E Tuinebreijer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.