Literature DB >> 15578253

[Marburg shoulder radiography splint (MSR splint) for standardized and high quality plain film radiography in fractures of the proximal humerus].

M Schnabel1, C Bahrs, E Walthers, L Gotzen.   

Abstract

To ensure safe, quick, pain-relieving, standardized, and reproducible high quality plain film radiography in fractures of the proximal humerus, the MSR splint was introduced into clinical practice. With the rectangular and completely radiolucent splint the shoulder radiographs are obtained in supine position by a sole radiographer. Two radiographs are taken in projection at 90 degrees to one another: the true anteroposterior and axillary views, the most important views for fracture visualization and assessment. The smooth flat bottom part of the splint glides easily across the X-ray table below the injured shoulder. The arm lying on the chest is carefully rotated externally up to the neutral position and placed in the splint, then fixed with Velcro fastening with the forearm supinated. The splint is adjusted to the patient for the anteroposterior view which is taken with the central ray directed at the coracoid process and perpendicularly on the film cassette. For the axillary view the MSR splint holding the upper extremity is carefully swiveled into a 80-90 degrees abduction position. Even in cases of comminuted fractures this maneuver is not painful for the patients. The X-ray tube is put into a horizontal position with the central ray pointing to the humeral head in an angle about 25 degrees to the long body axis. The cassette is placed upright in touch with the shoulder girdle. In our institution the MSR splint is not only routinely used for diagnosing fractures of the proximal humerus but also for radiological follow-up controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578253     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-004-0857-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  7 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder imaging. A review.

Authors:  K Tallroth
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1996

Review 2.  Assessment and management of three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  J Rees; J Hicks; W Ribbans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The value of axial view in the radiography of shoulder girdle--experiences with a new modification of positioning.

Authors:  M Putkonen; S Lähde; J Puranen; M Päivänsalo
Journal:  Rontgenblatter       Date:  1988-04

4.  The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  [Fractures of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  R Szyszkowitz; G Schippinger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.

Authors:  M L Sidor; J D Zuckerman; T Lyon; K Koval; F Cuomo; N Schoenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  [Fractures of the humeral head].

Authors:  H Resch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.000

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Sonographic diagnostics of proximal humerus fractures in juveniles].

Authors:  O Ackermann; S Sesia; T Berberich; P Liedgens; K Eckert; K Grosser; M Roessler; C Rülander; T Vogel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the MTM-classification for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Hagen Schmal; Erich Lingenfelter; Bernd Rolauffs; Kuno Weise; Klaus Dietz; Peter Helwig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Indications for computed tomography (CT-) diagnostics in proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study of plain radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Bernd Rolauffs; Norbert P Südkamp; Hagen Schmal; Christoph Eingartner; Klaus Dietz; Philippe L Pereira; Kuno Weise; Erich Lingenfelter; Peter Helwig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.