Literature DB >> 8257792

Delays in anaphase initiation occur in individual nuclei of the syncytial Drosophila embryo.

W Sullivan1, D R Daily, P Fogarty, K J Yook, S Pimpinelli.   

Abstract

The syncytial divisions of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo lack some of the well established cell-cycle checkpoints. It has been suggested that without these checkpoints the divisions would display a reduced fidelity. To test this idea, we examined division error frequencies in individuals bearing an abnormally long and rearranged second chromosome, designated C(2)EN. Relative to a normal chromosome, this chromosome imposes additional structural demands on the mitotic apparatus in both the early syncytial embryonic divisions and the later somatic divisions. We demonstrate that the C(2)EN chromosome does not increase the error frequency of the late larva neuroblast divisions. However, in the syncytial embryonic nuclear divisions, the C(2)EN chromosome produces a 10-fold increase in division errors relative to embryos with a normal karyotype. During late anaphase of the neuroblast divisions, the sister C(2)EN chromosomes cleanly separate from one another. In contrast, during late anaphase of the syncytial divisions in C(2)EN-bearing nuclei, large amounts of chromatin often lag on the metaphase plate. Live analysis of C(2)EN-bearing embryos demonstrates that individual nuclei in the syncytial population of dividing nuclei often delay in their initiation of anaphase. These delays frequently lead to division errors. Eventually the products of the nuclei delayed in anaphase sink inward and are removed from the dividing population of syncytial nuclei. These results suggest that the Drosophila embryo may be equipped with mechanisms that monitor the fidelity of the syncytial nuclear divisions. Unlike checkpoints that rely on cell cycle delays to identify and correct division errors, these embryonic mechanisms rely on cell cycle delays to identify and discard the products of division errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8257792      PMCID: PMC275719          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.4.9.885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  35 in total

1.  The gnu mutation of Drosophila causes inappropriate DNA synthesis in unfertilized and fertilized eggs.

Authors:  M Freeman; D M Glover
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The role of cyclin synthesis and degradation in the control of maturation promoting factor activity.

Authors:  A W Murray; M J Solomon; M W Kirschner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Changing rates of DNA and RNA synthesis in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  K V Anderson; J A Lengyel
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Ultrastructural patterns of RNA synthesis during early embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S L McKnight; O L Miller
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Scanning electron microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis. 1. The structure of the egg envelopes and the formation of the cellular blastoderm.

Authors:  F R Turner; A P Mahowald
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Autoradiographic study of protein and RNA formation during early development of Drosophila eggs.

Authors:  M Zalokar
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  The entire compound autosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Novitski; D Grace; C Strommen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Different drugs arrest cells at a number of distinct stages in G2.

Authors:  R A Tobey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Analysis of the chromosome aberrations induced by x-rays in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Gatti; C Tanzarella; G Olivieri
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Cell division from a genetic perspective.

Authors:  L H Hartwell
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  26 in total

1.  A spindle checkpoint functions during mitosis in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.

Authors:  Sandra E Encalada; John Willis; Rebecca Lyczak; Bruce Bowerman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Selective loss of sperm bearing a compound chromosome in the Drosophila female.

Authors:  A F Dernburg; D R Daily; K J Yook; J A Corbin; J W Sedat; W Sullivan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Exit from mitosis in Drosophila syncytial embryos requires proteolysis and cyclin degradation, and is associated with localized dephosphorylation.

Authors:  T T Su; F Sprenger; P J DiGregorio; S D Campbell; P H O'Farrell
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  A mutation in dVps28 reveals a link between a subunit of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport-I complex and the actin cytoskeleton in Drosophila.

Authors:  Evgueni A Sevrioukov; Nabil Moghrabi; Mary Kuhn; Helmut Krämer
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Genome stress response in early development.

Authors:  William F Marzluff; Robert J Duronio
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Genomic imprinting proposed as a surveillance mechanism for chromosome loss.

Authors:  J H Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular cloning and tissue-specific expression of the mutator2 gene (mu2) in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Kasravi; M F Walter; S Brand; J M Mason; H Biessmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Argonaute-1 functions as a mitotic regulator by controlling Cyclin B during Drosophila early embryogenesis.

Authors:  Sreerangam N C V L Pushpavalli; Arpita Sarkar; Indira Bag; Clayton R Hunt; M Janaki Ramaiah; Tej K Pandita; Utpal Bhadra; Manika Pal-Bhadra
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Drosophila MOF controls Checkpoint protein2 and regulates genomic stability during early embryogenesis.

Authors:  Sreerangam N C V L Pushpavalli; Arpita Sarkar; M Janaki Ramaiah; Debabani Roy Chowdhury; Utpal Bhadra; Manika Pal-Bhadra
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.946

10.  Strategies for outcrossing and genetic manipulation of Drosophila compound autosome stocks.

Authors:  T Martins; S Kotadia; N Malmanche; C E Sunkel; W Sullivan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.