Literature DB >> 8252888

Impact of multiple risk factors and ranitidine prophylaxis on the development of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. The Ranitidine Head Injury Study Group.

C A Metz1, D H Livingston, J S Smith, G M Larson, T H Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of risk factors on the development of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding in severe head injury patients randomized to treatment with a 6.25 mg/hr continuous ranitidine infusion or placebo.
DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
SETTING: Ten intensive care units in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients with severe head injury, defined as having a Glasgow Coma Score of < or = 10, were eligible for enrollment.
INTERVENTIONS: Ranitidine 6.25 mg/hr or saline placebo was administered by continuous infusion for a maximum of 5 days.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated every 8 hrs for the presence of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Bleeding developed in 15 (19%) of 81 placebo-treated patients vs. three (3%) of 86 ranitidine-treated patients (p = .002). None of the individual risk factors had a significant effect on bleeding frequency. No bleeding occurred in the four patients with one risk factor. Placebo bleeding rates in patients with 2, 3 to 5, and > 5 risk factors were 20%, 20%, and 18%, respectively. For the ranitidine-treated patients, bleeding was reported in 0%, 5%, and 0% in the 2, 3 to 5, and > 5 risk factor subgroups, respectively. Pneumonia occurred in 19% of the placebo-treated patients vs. 14% in the ranitidine treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS: The full risk to develop stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding was realized when two risk factors were present concomitantly. The presence of additional risk factors did not increase the occurrence of bleeding. A continuous infusion of ranitidine at 6.25 mg/hr provided significant protection from bleeding, regardless of the number of risk factors present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8252888     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199312000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  22 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  J L Vincent
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Association between proton pump inhibitors and respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Nabil Sultan; Jose Nazareno; James Gregor
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Use of Enteral Nutrition for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Carolyn Newberry; Jessica Schucht
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2018-09

4.  Do we still need pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis at the ICU?

Authors:  Lukas Buendgens; Frank Tacke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal prophylaxis in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Clemens M Schirmer; Joshua Kornbluth; Carl B Heilman; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 6.  Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Sick Eom; Christie Y Jeon; Ju-Won Lim; Eun-Geol Cho; Sang Min Park; Kang-Sook Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Risk of fracture and pneumonia from acid suppressive drugs.

Authors:  Chun-Sick Eom; Sang-Soo Lee
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2011-09-26

Review 8.  Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Alicia J Mangram; Joseph F Sucher; Victor Zach
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care patients given ranitidine and sucralfate for prevention of stress ulcer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  A Messori; S Trippoli; M Vaiani; M Gorini; A Corrado
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-04

10.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Marija Barbateskovic; Søren Marker; Anders Granholm; Carl Thomas Anthon; Mette Krag; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.