Literature DB >> 8249311

Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance.

E Castet1, J Lorenceau, M Shiffrar, C Bonnet.   

Abstract

In this study, the perceived speed of a tilted line translating horizontally (for a duration of 167 msec) is evaluated with respect to a vertical line undergoing the same translation. Perceived speed of the oblique line is shown to be underestimated when compared to the vertical line. This bias increases: (1) when the line is further tilted, (2) with greater line lengths, (3) with lower contrasts, and finally (4) with a speed of 2.1 deg/sec as compared to a higher speed of 4.2 deg/sec. These results may be accounted for by considering that two velocity signals are used by the visual system to estimate the speed of the line: the translation of this line (this signal does not depend on the line's orientation) and the motion component normal to the line (this signal depends on orientation). We suggest that these two signals are encoded by different types of units and that the translation signal is specifically extracted at the line endings. We further suggest that these signals are integrated by a weighted average process according to their perceptual salience. Other interpretations are considered at the light of current models dealing with the two-dimensional integration of different velocity signals.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8249311     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90019-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Motion-based prediction is sufficient to solve the aperture problem.

Authors:  Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Explaining the footsteps, belly dancer, Wenceslas, and kickback illusions.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Peter G Thompson; Stuart M Anstis; Hersh Sagreiya; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Reciprocal interactions between occlusion and motion computations.

Authors:  B L Anderson; P Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Form features provide a cue to the angular velocity of rotating objects.

Authors:  Christopher David Blair; Jessica Goold; Kyle Killebrew; Gideon Paul Caplovitz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Global motion percept mediated through integration of barber poles presented in bilateral visual hemifields.

Authors:  Li-Ting Huang; Alice M K Wong; Carl P C Chen; Wei-Han Chang; Ju-Wen Cheng; Yu-Ru Lin; Yu-Cheng Pei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interactions between motion and form processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Helmholtz illusion makes you look fit only when you are already fit, but not for everyone.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ashida; Kana Kuraguchi; Kiyofumi Miyoshi
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-07-10

8.  Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Jolyon Troscianko; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The role of stripe orientation in target capture success.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Richard S Magor-Elliott; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.