Literature DB >> 8249309

Spatial-frequency- and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation.

N Graham1, A Sutter, C Venkatesan.   

Abstract

Models incorporating spatial-frequency- and orientation-selective channels explain many texture-segregation results, particularly when known nonlinearities are included. One such nonlinearity is complex channels. A complex channel consists of two stages of linear filtering separated by a rectification-type nonlinearity. Here we investigate the spatial-frequency- and orientation-selectivity of simple (linear) channels and of the complex channels' first stage. Observers rated the degree of segregation between two "textures" both composed of elements which were Gabor patches. When the textures differed in type of element (e.g. one composed of vertical and the other of horizontal Gabor patches), the segregation results yield bandwidth estimates for simple channels of approx. 0.5-1.0 octave on the spatial-frequency dimension and 5-20 deg of rotation on the orientation dimension. When the textures differ in the arrangement of elements (e.g. striped vs checkerboard arrangements, both of horizontal and vertical patches), the segregation results yield bandwidth estimates for the first stage of complex channels. These estimates, while differing substantially from one observer to another, were always substantially wider than those for simple channels (by at least a factor of two) but narrower than bandwidths of LGN cells (particularly on the orientation dimension where LGN cells show little selectivity at all).

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8249309     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90017-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Pooling of first-order inputs in second-order vision.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Element-arrangement textures in multiple objective tasks.

Authors:  S Sabina Wolfson; Norma Graham
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte; Charles F Chubb
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

4.  Effect of degree of uniformity on predicted visual cortical response tuning curves.

Authors:  M Almon; H Spitzer
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Inconsistent channel bandwidth estimates suggest winner-take-all nonlinearity in second-order vision.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; Christopher A Henry; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Attention alters spatial resolution by modulating second-order processing.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Luminance potentiates human visuocortical responses.

Authors:  Louis N Vinke; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A computational model to link psychophysics and cortical cell activation patterns in human texture processing.

Authors:  A Thielscher; H Neumann
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 1.453

9.  Perceptual integration and attention in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Francesca Strappini; Gaspare Galati; Marialuisa Martelli; Enrico Di Pace; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.