Literature DB >> 8246816

Characterization of neuroblastoma xenograft in rat flank. I. Growth, interstitial fluid pressure, and interstitial fluid velocity distribution profiles.

G R DiResta1, J Lee, S M Larson, E Arbit.   

Abstract

The growth, interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and interstitial fluid velocity (IFV) profiles of a human neuroblastoma propagated in the flank of an immune suppressed rat were characterized. IFP was measured in the tumor center as a function of size, while radial distributions of IFP and IFV were measured in 2-cm tumors. IFP and IFV were measured using the wick-in-needle and clearance of locally generated hydrogen techniques, respectively. These techniques have a high spatial resolution, permit repetitive measurements, and are minimally invasive. We observed that IFP in the neuroblastoma increased as the tumor grew. Furthermore, IFP increased and its IFV decreased from the periphery toward the center of the tumor. Measured IFP and IFV values were compared to theoretical expectations calculated from the Baxter and Jain mathematical model. The predictions were highly correlated to the measured IFP and IFV profiles with the transport impedence parameter alpha 2 = 24.4. From our measurement data and the Baxter-Jain equations, we computed the interstitium hydraulic conductivity for neuroblastoma to be 7.11 x 10(-6) cm2/mm Hg-sec.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8246816     DOI: 10.1006/mvre.1993.1044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microvasc Res        ISSN: 0026-2862            Impact factor:   3.514


  10 in total

1.  Impact of hydrostatic pressure on phase-change contrast agent activation by pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Saurabh Raut; Mawia Khairalseed; Arvin Honari; Shashank R Sirsi; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Toward a noninvasive estimate of interstitial fluid pressure by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in a rat model of cerebral tumor.

Authors:  Rasha Elmghirbi; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Stephen L Brown; Kelly A Keenan; Swayamprava Panda; Glauber Cabral; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; George W Divine; Ian Y Lee; James R Ewing
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Evaluation of a voxelized model based on DCE-MRI for tracer transport in tumor.

Authors:  K N Magdoom; Gregory L Pishko; Jung Hwan Kim; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Cancer Therapy: What Is Available and What Is Yet to Come.

Authors:  Phatsapong Yingchoncharoen; Danuta S Kalinowski; Des R Richardson
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Conditionally replicating adenoviruses for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Youssef Jounaidi; Joshua C Doloff; David J Waxman
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.428

6.  Interstitial fluid pressure in intracranial tumours in patients and in rodents.

Authors:  Y Boucher; H Salehi; B Witwer; G R Harsh; R K Jain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Longitudinal Monitoring of Simulated Interstitial Fluid Pressure for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ramesh Paudyal; Eve LoCastro; Marsha Reyngold; Richard Kinh Do; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Jung Hun Oh; Abhay Dave; Kenneth Yu; Karyn A Goodman; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Renal clearable nanocarriers: Overcoming the physiological barriers for precise drug delivery and clearance.

Authors:  Chuanqi Peng; Yingyu Huang; Jie Zheng
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Interstitial fluid pressure, vascularity and metastasis in ectopic, orthotopic and spontaneous tumours.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Lunt; Tuula Mk Kalliomaki; Allison Brown; Victor X Yang; Michael Milosevic; Richard P Hill
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Intratumoral infusion of fluid: estimation of hydraulic conductivity and implications for the delivery of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Y Boucher; C Brekken; P A Netti; L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.