Literature DB >> 8246641

Patient-mix differences among ambulatory providers and their effects on utilization and payments for Maryland Medicaid users.

M E Stuart1, D M Steinwachs.   

Abstract

Characteristics of the usual source of care (e.g. specialty, organizational type) are known to be related to utilization and cost levels. This study assesses the degree to which variations in utilization and cost are attributable to differences in patient mix (i.e. demographic and diagnostic characteristics). Comparisons are made with Medicaid payments with and without patient-mix adjustment among users of hospital outpatient departments, emergency rooms, Federally Qualified Health Centers and office-based physicians. The study builds upon previous work by including a well-developed set of ambulatory case-mix controls, a variety of provider types, a large number of providers, and a relatively comprehensive resource utilization component. Findings confirm significant differences in patient demographic and diagnostic characteristics among users of different types of providers. Controlling for these patient-mix characteristics explains 44% of the variation in ambulatory use, 21% in hospital admissions, and 13% in total Medicaid payments. The considerable remaining variation suggests differences in provider efficiency. For example, even after patient mix adjustment, 18% of those who rely on outpatient departments are hospitalized annually compared to 10% for users of office-based physicians. Overall findings indicate that patient-mix characteristics, as well as differences in provider efficiency, should be considered when developing and evaluating managed care and preferred provider initiatives for ambulatory care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8246641     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199312000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of enhanced prenatal services for Medicaid-eligible women in public and private settings.

Authors:  L Simpson; C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Balancing investments in Federally Qualified Health Centers and Medicaid for improved access and coverage in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Paul M Griffin; Hyunji Lee; Christina Scherrer; Julie L Swann
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

3.  Factors affecting use of resources for asthma patients.

Authors:  Bayram Sahin; Mehtap Tatar
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Ambulatory care practice variation within a Medicaid program.

Authors:  J P Weiner; B H Starfield; N R Powe; M E Stuart; D M Steinwachs
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Impact of provider continuity on quality of care for persons with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  James M Gill; Arch G Mainous; James J Diamond; M James Lenhard
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Profiling resource use by primary-care practices: managed Medicare implications.

Authors:  S T Parente; J P Weiner; D W Garnick; J Fowles; A G Lawthers; R H Palmer
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1996

7.  Developing a dashboard to help measure and achieve the triple aim: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Hsien-Yeang Seow; Lyn M Sibley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.