BACKGROUND: Many patients with diabetes fail to receive recommended monitoring tests. One reason might be inadequate continuity of care. This study examined the association between provider continuity and completion of monitoring tests for patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on claims data from a private national health plan for 1 year (January 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999). Participants had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and at least 2 outpatient visits during the study year (N = 1,795). The association was measured between continuity of care with an individual provider and completion of 3 diabetes monitoring tests: a glycosylated hemoglobin test, a lipid profile, and an eye examination. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of patients had a glycosylated hemoglobin test, 66% had a lipid profile, and 28% had an eye examination during the study year. After controlling for demographics, number of diabetes visits, case mix, and diabetes complications, provider continuity was not significantly associated with the receipt of a glycosylated hemoglobin test (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.16), a lipid profile (OR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.57-1.64) or an eye examination (OR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.30-1.19). When continuity was measured only among primary care providers, there was no significant association for receipt of a glycosylated hemoglobin test (OR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.41-1.33), a lipid profile (OR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.53-1.47) or an eye examination (OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.35-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no association between provider continuity and completion of diabetes monitoring tests in a national privately insured population. Whereas continuity might benefit other aspects of health care, it does not appear to benefit improved monitoring for diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Many patients with diabetes fail to receive recommended monitoring tests. One reason might be inadequate continuity of care. This study examined the association between provider continuity and completion of monitoring tests for patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on claims data from a private national health plan for 1 year (January 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999). Participants had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and at least 2 outpatient visits during the study year (N = 1,795). The association was measured between continuity of care with an individual provider and completion of 3 diabetes monitoring tests: a glycosylated hemoglobin test, a lipid profile, and an eye examination. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of patients had a glycosylated hemoglobin test, 66% had a lipid profile, and 28% had an eye examination during the study year. After controlling for demographics, number of diabetes visits, case mix, and diabetes complications, provider continuity was not significantly associated with the receipt of a glycosylated hemoglobin test (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.16), a lipid profile (OR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.57-1.64) or an eye examination (OR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.30-1.19). When continuity was measured only among primary care providers, there was no significant association for receipt of a glycosylated hemoglobin test (OR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.41-1.33), a lipid profile (OR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.53-1.47) or an eye examination (OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.35-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no association between provider continuity and completion of diabetes monitoring tests in a national privately insured population. Whereas continuity might benefit other aspects of health care, it does not appear to benefit improved monitoring for diabetes.
Authors: C L Marshall; M Bluestein; C Chapin; T Davis; J Gersten; C Harris; A Hodgin; W Larsen; H Rigberg; V Krishnaswami; B Darling Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 1996 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Melanie Inkster; Alan Montgomery; Peter Donnan; Tom MacDonald; Frank Sullivan; Tom Fahey Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Sarah H Gordon; Yoojin Lee; Chima D Ndumele; Patrick M Vivier; Roee Gutman; Shailender Swaminathan; Emily A Gadbois; Renee R Shield; Amy Jo Haavisto Kind; Amal N Trivedi Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah H Gordon; Benjamin D Sommers; Ira Wilson; Omar Galarraga; Amal N Trivedi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.128