Literature DB >> 8245261

A survey of attitudes, beliefs, and behavior regarding tanning bed use, sunbathing, and sunscreen use.

V B Mawn1, A B Fleischer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cosmetic tanning and unprotected solar exposure are common, little is known about general attitudes, beliefs, and behavior regarding sunbathing, sunscreen use, and tanning salon use.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the frequency of UV exposure in a select sample and to assess the knowledge and beliefs of the effects of UV irradiation.
METHODS: A written, anonymous questionnaire was distributed to a sample of 477 persons in a shopping mall, at a social gathering, and on a vacation cruise ship. The instrument explored demographic information, sunscreen use, sunbathing habits, tanning bed use, and cutaneous solar effects.
RESULTS: Forty-two percent of respondents seldom or never used sunscreen, and 33% sunbathed at least once a week. Although the three sample populations differed in education, sunbathing habits, sunscreen use, and tanning bed use, they were equally informed about UV light hazards. Compared with those who had not used tanning beds, tanning bed users were more likely to be female and more knowledgeable about the long-term effects of UV. Tanning beds were most commonly used in tanning or hair salons, (mean 23 +/- 7 minutes at 2.3 +/- 1.1 times per week). Reported positive psychologic sequelae from tanning bed use were more common than negative physical sequelae. At least 10% would continue to use tanning beds if these were proved to cause skin cancer.
CONCLUSION: In this select sample, sunbathing and tanning bed use were common. No group surveyed universally practiced sun protection and avoidance. Clientele of tanning beds may be aware of the damaging effects of the sun, but may not be aware that tanning bed use is associated with skin damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8245261     DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(93)70274-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  11 in total

1.  Indoor tanning facility density in eighty U.S. cities.

Authors:  Richard C Palmer; Joni A Mayer; Susan I Woodruff; Laura Eckhardt; James F Sallis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-06

2.  Prevalence and correlates of indoor tanning among US adults.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Melanocyte-stimulating hormone directly enhances UV-Induced DNA repair in keratinocytes by a xeroderma pigmentosum group A-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Liang Dong; Ji Wen; Eric Pier; Xiao Zhang; Bo Zhang; Fangzheng Dong; Nick Ziegler; Margaret Mysz; Rafael Armenta; Rutao Cui
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Adolescent attitudes towards tanning: does age matter?

Authors:  Leslie K Dennis; Vijaya Kancherla; Linda G Snetselaar
Journal:  Ped Health       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Tanning behavior among young frequent tanners is related to attitudes and not lack of knowledge about the dangers.

Authors:  Leslie K Dennis; John B Lowe; Linda G Snetselaar
Journal:  Health Educ J       Date:  2009-09

6.  Psychiatric and addictive symptoms of young adult female indoor tanners.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Jessye Cohen-Filipic; Susan Darlow; Jacqueline D Kloss; Sharon L Manne; Teja Munshi
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2013-04-26

7.  Examination of the short-term efficacy of a parent-based intervention to prevent skin cancer.

Authors:  Rob Turrisi; Joel Hillhouse; Sarah Heavin; June Robinson; Malissa Adams; Jessica Berry
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-08

Review 8.  International prevalence of indoor tanning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mackenzie R Wehner; Mary-Margaret Chren; Danielle Nameth; Aditi Choudhry; Matthew Gaskins; Kevin T Nead; W John Boscardin; Eleni Linos
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.282

9.  A population-based survey on tanning bed use in Germany.

Authors:  Franziska U Börner; Holger Schütz; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-20

10.  Effects of systematic asymmetric discounting on physician-patient interactions: a theoretical framework to explain poor compliance with lifestyle counseling.

Authors:  Steven R Feldman; G John Chen; Judy Y Hu; Alan B Fleischer
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2002-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.