Literature DB >> 8244650

Early experience with leg lengthening by callotasis and chondrodiastasis.

J O'Beirne1, M Maher, S O'Flanagan, A McGuinness.   

Abstract

Over a four year period, 20 segments in 16 patients were treated by lengthening by callotasis or chondrodiastasis. The indications for treatment were leg length discrepancy in 13 patients and short stature in three. Patients with leg length discrepancy were all treated by femoral lengthening; the mean length gained was 4.4 cm (range 2.5 to 6.Ocm). For patients with short stature, the mean femoral length gain was 10.0 cm (9.0 to 10.5 cm), and the mean tibial length gain was 8.0 cm (6.5 to 9.0 cm). The commonest problem was pin tract infection, but this always settled with antibiotic therapy. Most other complications were also successfully dealt with, and did not compromise the outcome of treatment. At the time of review, 13 of the 16 patients said they were very happy with the result; two patients were reserving judgement until completion of treatment, and, only one thought the treatment had been of no benefit. Our initial experience, with callotasis in particular, has been that it is a highly satisfactory method of limb lengthening, has an acceptable complication rate, and involves minimal hospitalization as compared with older techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8244650     DOI: 10.1007/bf02960724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  16 in total

1.  Results of 21 Wagner limb lengthenings in 20 patients.

Authors:  D Chandler; J D King; S M Bernstein; G Marrero; J Koh; H Hambrecht
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Psychologic, vascular, and physiologic aspects of lower limb lengthening in achondroplastics.

Authors:  F Lavini; L Renzi-Brivio; G de Bastiani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of different methods of leg lengthening.

Authors:  A Dal Monte; O Donzelli
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Metaphyseal distraction for lower limb lengthening and correction of axial deformities.

Authors:  D Schlenzka; M Poussa; K Osterman
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Limb lengthening in achondroplasia by Ilizarov's method.

Authors:  R Cattaneo; A Villa; M Catagni; L Tentori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [The course of compact bone reparative regeneration in distraction osteosynthesis under different conditions of bone fragment fixation (experimental study)].

Authors:  G A Ilizarov; V I Lediaev; V P Shitin
Journal:  Eksp Khir Anesteziol       Date:  1969 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique.

Authors:  D Paley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Femoral lengthening by the Wagner method.

Authors:  R Guarniero; T E Barros Júnior
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Lengthening of the lower limbs and correction of lumbar hyperlordosis in achondroplasia.

Authors:  J M Vilarrubias; I Ginebreda; E Jimeno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Chondrodiatasis-controlled symmetrical distraction of the epiphyseal plate. Limb lengthening in children.

Authors:  G De Bastiani; R Aldegheri; L Renzi Brivio; G Trivella
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.