Literature DB >> 8244426

Axon termination conditions for electrical stimulation.

J T Rubinstein1.   

Abstract

The cable model for electrical stimulation near the terminal of a passive fiber is derived for excitation by an arbitrary, time-varying, applied extracellular field. Unless the termination impedance is comparable to that of mammalian node of Ranvier, the end-conditions require the longitudinal intracellular current at the fiber terminal to be negligibly small. This requirement substantially alters the membrane potential profile from that obtained with a fiber of infinite length. Stimulation near the end of a fiber may result in lower thresholds and may reverse the anodal/cathodal threshold ratio obtained with stimulation in the mid-portion of the fiber. Chronaxie for stimulation near the terminal may be much smaller than at a distance from the terminal and the strength-duration curve may be nonmonotonic. These differences may have significant implications for any application of electrical stimulation where fiber terminations may play a role in the excitatory process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8244426     DOI: 10.1109/10.237695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  16 in total

1.  The "mirror" estimate: an intuitive predictor of membrane polarization during extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Joucla; Blaise Yvert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Antidromic propagation of action potentials in branched axons: implications for the mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Warren M Grill; Meredith B Cantrell; Matthew S Robertson
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Design and in vivo evaluation of more efficient and selective deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Brian Huynh; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

5.  Deep brain stimulation of terminating axons.

Authors:  Kelsey L Bower; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Jacques Chatron; Stéphane Roman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-30

7.  Simulated auditory nerve axon demyelination alters sensitivity and response timing to extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; Gabrielle E O'Brien; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Preston Williams; John H Martin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  A Driving-Force Predictor for Estimating Pathway Activation in Patient-Specific Models of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Kabilar Gunalan; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 10.  High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Dennis Q Truong; Devin K Adair; Bruce J Simon; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.