Literature DB >> 8244145

DNA densitometry of colorectal cancer.

G T Deans1, K Williamson, P Hamilton, M Heatley, K Arthurs, C C Patterson, B J Rowlands, T G Parks, R A Spence.   

Abstract

DNA analysis was assessed by densitometry for 281 cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Detection of aneuploidy in a single case rose from 65% if one, to 92.5% when three or more sections, were analysed. Although aneuploid tumours had significantly larger nuclear areas than near diploid tumours (p = 0.009), densitometric measurements showed no association with clinicopathological variables. DNA content determined by densitometry was compared with that from flow cytometry on 465 tissue sections from 241 cases. Aneuploidy assessed by flow cytometry was significantly associated with that determined by densitometry (p < 0.01 for all comparisons), ploidy state being similar in 381 sections (82%, kappa = 0.63, p < 0.001), and 187 cases (77.6%, kappa = 0.57, p < 0.001). Univariate survival analysis showed that DNA densitometric variables had no significant association with survival in (a) all cases, (b) cases without lymph node metastases, or (c) cases without distant metastases. Multivariate regression analysis of densitometric and clinicopathological variables identified Dukes's stage, patient age, and tumour differentiation as the combination of variables most closely related to survival. Densitometric measurement of DNA content could not significantly improve on the prognostic model containing these three variables. It is concluded that, although the assessment of DNA content by densitometry is comparable with that of flow cytometry, conventional histological variables remain the best predictors of prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8244145      PMCID: PMC1374423          DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.11.1566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  51 in total

1.  The Feulgen hydrolysis profile and breast carcinoma: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R G Mays; C W Elston; I O Ellis; R W Blamey; C S Dowe
Journal:  Med Lab Sci       Date:  1988-01

2.  Value of flow cytometric determination of ploidy as a guide to prognosis in operable rectal cancer: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  H S Goh; J R Jass; W S Atkin; J Cuzick; J M Northover
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prognostic value of cytophotometric analysis of DNA in lymph node aspirates from patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  J Vucković; M Dubravcić; J M Matthews; S N Wickramasinghe; M Dominis; B Jaksić
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Prognostic value of DNA content in colorectal carcinoma. A flow cytometric study with some methodologic aspects.

Authors:  S O Emdin; R Stenling; G Roos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Poor palliation of colorectal malignancy with the neodymium yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser.

Authors:  N Bright; P Hale; R Mason
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The possibility of nonpolypoid carcinogenesis in the large intestine as inferred from frequencies of DNA aneuploidy of polypoid and crater-shaped carcinomas.

Authors:  S Hamada; K Namura; S Fujita
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in rectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  P Quirke; M F Dixon; A D Clayden; P Durdey; J E Dyson; N S Williams; C C Bird
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Nuclear morphometric measurements in rectal adenocarcinoma cells of patients of different races.

Authors:  F Michelassi; L E Vannucci; A G Montag; H E Dytch; M Bibbo
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 0.302

9.  DNA assessment in thin sections of lymphomas by densitometric and stereological methods: comparison with imprint and flow cytometric results.

Authors:  P Felman; C Souchier; M Ffrench; H Ploye; P A Bryon
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.916

10.  Survival of large bowel carcinoma patients with different DNA ploidy.

Authors:  T O Rognum; E Thorud; E Lund
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Aneuploidy and elevated CEA indicate an increased risk for metachronous metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Verena Bente; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Helena Voulgaris; Martina Oberländer; Katharina Schillo; Markus Kleemann; Conny Bürk; Hans-Peter Bruch; Uwe J Roblick; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Stage-specific frequency and prognostic significance of aneuploidy in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer--a meta-analysis and current overview.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Michael Linnebacher; Alexandra König; Brigitte Vollmar; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Computer-aided Image Processing of Angiogenic Histological.

Authors:  Matvey Sprindzuk; Alexander Dmitruk; Vassili Kovalev; Armen Bogush; Alexander Tuzikov; Victor Liakhovski; Mikhail Fridman
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2009-12-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.