Literature DB >> 8244119

Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach.

G C Vander Velpen1, S M Shimi, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

The pre and postoperative symptoms and outcome after surgery in patients with symptomatic gall stone disease were evaluated by a detailed self administered postal questionnaire. The survey was conducted in two groups: 80 patients treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an age matched cohort of patients who had conventional open cholecystectomy. The overall response rate on which the data were calculated was 76%. Symptomatic benefit ratios accruing from the surgical removal of the gall bladder were calculated. The symptoms that were relieved by cholecystectomy were nausea (0.98), vomiting (0.91), colicky abdominal pain (0.81), and backpain (0.76). Flatulence, fat intolerance, and nagging abdominal pain were unaffected as shown by a benefit ratio of 0.5 or less. Relief of heartburn (39/49) outweighed the de novo development of this symptom after cholecystectomy (7/49), resulting in a benefit ratio of 0.65. Postcholecystectomy diarrhoea occurred in 21/118 patients (18%): 10 after open cholecystectomy and 11 after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The type of surgical access did not influence the symptomatic outcome but had a significant bearing on the time to return to work or full activity after surgery (laparoscopic cholecystectomy two weeks, open cholecystectomy eight weeks, p = 0.00001). In the elderly age group (> 60 years), significantly more patients (29/30) regained full activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared with the open cholecystectomy group (16/22), p = 0.001. The patient appreciation of a satisfactory cosmetic result was 72% in the open group compared with 100% of patients who were treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p = 0.0017). Despite the persistence or de novo occurrence of symptoms, 111/117 patients (95%) considered that they had obtained overall symptomatic improvement by their surgical treatment and 110/118 (93%) were pleased with the end result regardless of the access used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8244119      PMCID: PMC1374560          DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.10.1448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  13 in total

1.  Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era. A standard for comparison.

Authors:  L Morgenstern; L Wong; G Berci
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-04

2.  Idiopathic bile acid catharsis.

Authors:  E H Thaysen; L Pedersen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Cholecystectomy and gallbladder conservation.

Authors:  T N Walsh; R C Russell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patients.

Authors:  G C Vitale; D Collet; G M Larson; W G Cheadle; F B Miller; J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Factors influencing the long term results of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Stefanini; M Carboni; N Patrassi; P Loriga; G De Bernardinis; P Negro
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1974-11

6.  The alkaline shift in gastric pH after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T H Brown; G Walton; W G Cheadle; G M Larson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Dyspepsia in England and Scotland.

Authors:  R H Jones; S E Lydeard; F D Hobbs; J E Kenkre; E I Williams; S J Jones; J A Repper; J L Caldow; W M Dunwoodie; J M Bottomley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; J A Barteau; R V Clayman; S W Ashley; D L Dunnegan
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-02

9.  Postcholecystectomy symptoms. A prospective study of gall stone patients before and two years after surgery.

Authors:  E Ros; D Zambon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Influence of cholecystectomy on symptoms.

Authors:  T Bates; S R Ebbs; M Harrison; R P A'Hern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Amy C Lord; Julian Teare; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?

Authors:  Mark Bignell; Andrew Hindmarsh; Haritharan Nageswaran; Bhavani Mothe; Andrew Jenkinson; David Mahon; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Biliary events and an increased risk of new onset irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  M A McNally; G R Locke; A R Zinsmeister; C D Schleck; J Peterson; N J Talley
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 4.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Incidence of persistent symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  W Luman; W H Adams; S N Nixon; I M Mcintyre; D Hamer-Hodges; G Wilson; K R Palmer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness.

Authors:  Mark P Lamberts; Marjolein Lugtenberg; Maroeska M Rovers; Anne J Roukema; Joost P H Drenth; Gert P Westert; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A safe and effective alternative surgical technique in "difficult cholecystectomies".

Authors:  Fatih Kulen; Deniz Tihan; Uğur Duman; Emrah Bayam; Gökhan Zaim
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 8.  Is cholecystectomy effective treatment for symptomatic gallstones? Clinical outcome after long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G P Gui; C V Cheruvu; N West; K Sivaniah; A G Fiennes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a conscious preference among Turkish patients with symptomatic gallstones?--prospective study.

Authors:  Asim Cingi; Fikret Düşünceli; Bahadir M Güllüoğlu; Cumhur Yeğen; A Ozdemir Aktan; Rifat Yalin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy nearly abolishes the postoperative hepatic catabolic stress response.

Authors:  H Glerup; H Heindorff; A Flyvbjerg; S L Jensen; H Vilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.