Literature DB >> 8241782

Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (PTEAM) 1990 study: method performance and data quality for personal, indoor, and outdoor monitoring.

K W Thomas1, E D Pellizzari, C A Clayton, D A Whitaker, R C Shores, J Spengler, H Ozkaynak, S E Froehlich, L A Wallace.   

Abstract

The Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (PTEAM) study provided the opportunity to test methodologies for measuring personal and microenvironmental PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in a full-scale probability-based sample of 178 persons and homes in Riverside, California during the fall of 1990. The purpose of the study was to estimate frequency distributions of exposure to PM10, PM2.5, and selected elements in an urban population. Quality control samples and analyses were used to evaluate method performance. These included collocated sample collection, field and lab blank filters, sampler and balance field audits, and intra- and interlaboratory replicate elemental analyses. A portion of the study was also designed to include side-by-side operation of the personal and microenvironmental samplers with reference method (high-volume and dichotomous) samplers to provide an evaluation of method comparability. Over 95% of the approximately 2,900 scheduled samples were collected and analyzed, with very few losses due to equipment failure. The method limit of detection for the personal and microenvironmental monitor PM10 sampling was 8 micrograms/m3. Mean relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 2% to 8% were obtained for collocated personal and microenvironmental samples. Sampler flow rates were within the +/- 10% accuracy criterion during two field audits. Balances operated in a specially designed mobile laboratory were within specified tolerances for precision (+/- 4 micrograms) and accuracy (+/- 50 micrograms). Elemental analysis accuracy was measured with standard reference materials with biases ranging from 2% to 7%. Measurement precision for most elements ranged from 2.5% to 25% mean RSD. Personal and microenvironmental samplers gave median PM10 concentrations that were approximately 9% higher than the dichotomous sampler and 16% higher than the high-volume sampler across 96 monitoring periods at a fixed outdoor location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8241782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  12 in total

1.  Mass concentration and elemental composition of PM10 in classrooms.

Authors:  N A Janssen; G Hoek; B Brunekreef; H Harssema
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Exposure error masks the relationship between traffic-related air pollution and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Helen H Suh; Antonella Zanobetti
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Different relationships between personal exposure and ambient concentration by particle size.

Authors:  Sooyoung Guak; Kiyoung Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Upper airway response in workers exposed to fuel oil ash: nasal lavage analysis.

Authors:  R Hauser; S Elreedy; J A Hoppin; D C Christiani
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  An evaluation of the impact of flooring types on exposures to fine and coarse particles within the residential micro-environment using CONTAM.

Authors:  Lisa Bramwell; Jing Qian; Cynthia Howard-Reed; Sumona Mondal; Andrea R Ferro
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Factors affecting personal exposure to thoracic and fine particles and their components.

Authors:  Shao-I Hsu; Kazuhiko Ito; Michaela Kendall; Morton Lippmann
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  MODELING OF HUMAN EXPOSURE TO IN-VEHICLE PM(2.5) FROM ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE.

Authors:  Ye Cao; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Statistical issues in farmworker studies.

Authors:  David T Mage; Lance A Wallace; Mel Kollander; Wayne R Ott
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Current state of the science: health effects and indoor environmental quality.

Authors:  Clifford S Mitchell; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Torben Sigsgaard; Matti Jantunen; Paul J Lioy; Robert Samson; Meryl H Karol
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.