Literature DB >> 8238696

Medical technology assessment and practice guidelines: their day in court.

G F Anderson1, M A Hall, E P Steinberg.   

Abstract

There is the expectation that outcomes research and the promulgation of medical practice guidelines will be able to identify and hopefully reduce the amount of unnecessary or inappropriate medical care through a variety of methods, including utilization review. However, past efforts by public and private insurers to deny claims on the basis of formal technology assessments or practice guidelines have frequently been overturned by the courts for multifarious reasons. This paper examines the court's reluctance to accept a variety of technology assessment methods in coverage policy decisions. The paper reviews the options that have been proposed to restrict judicial involvement in the formulation of coverage policy and then proposes a new option that employs a more precise taxonomy of medical practice assessment.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8238696      PMCID: PMC1694869          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.11.1635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Controlling health care costs by controlling technology: a private contractual approach.

Authors:  Paul E Kalb
Journal:  Yale Law J       Date:  1990-03

2.  Defining experimental therapy--a third-party payer's dilemma.

Authors:  L N Newcomer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Health, health insurance, and the uninsured.

Authors:  R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Reimbursing new technologies: why are the courts judging experimental medicine?

Authors:  R S Saver
Journal:  Stanford Law Rev       Date:  1992-05

5.  Court-ordered reimbursement for unproven medical technology. Circumventing technology assessment.

Authors:  J H Ferguson; M Dubinsky; P J Kirsch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Evaluation of medical-technology strategies: proposal for an institute for health-care evaluation (second of two parts).

Authors:  J P Bunker; J Fowles; R Schaffarzick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice.

Authors:  R E Park; A Fink; R H Brook; M R Chassin; K L Kahn; N J Merrick; J Kosecoff; D H Solomon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  The review process used by US health care plans to evaluate new medical technology for coverage.

Authors:  C A Steiner; N R Powe; G F Anderson; A Das
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A survey of physician attitudes and practices concerning cost-effectiveness in patient care.

Authors:  M E Ginsburg; R L Kravitz; W A Sandberg
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-12

3.  Analysis of rating appropriateness and patient outcomes in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Yoon Jung Choi; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?

Authors:  W K Mariner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.