Literature DB >> 8237986

Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.

T V Perneger1, J F Etter, A Rougemont.   

Abstract

Insufficient response rates are a frequent problem in mailed epidemiologic health surveys. As part of a health survey of 1,235 young adults conducted from November 1992 through January 1993 in Geneva, Switzerland, a randomized factorial trial was carried out to assess the contributions of two tactics to increase response rates. The first incentive was the promise of sending 10 Swiss francs (7 US dollars) to respondents; the second was a red postcard, mailed 2 days after the questionnaire, which reminded potential participants to complete the questionnaire. The most effective strategy according to interim analysis was to be selected for follow-up mailings. Two weeks after the first mailing, response rates were 65% for those who had received both incentives, 57% for those who had been offered the money reward only, 54% for recipients of the reminder card, and 48% for those who had received neither incentive (p based on chi 2 (3 df) test < 0.001). The relative hazards of responding were 1.34 (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.55) for the money reward and 1.22 (95% confidence interval 1.05-1.41) for the reminder card. Follow-up mailings to all nonrespondents included both incentives. At the end of data collection, 1,007 persons (82%) had returned the questionnaire. The final response rates were 83, 84, 82, and 78% in the four groups, respectively (p = 0.29). Both the promise of a monetary reward and a reminder postcard considerably improved early response rates. The use of both incentives in follow-up mailings brought final response rates above 80%, except for those who had received no initial incentive. Testing various combinations of incentives in the early stages of a mailed health survey may be a generally useful strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8237986     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  14 in total

1.  Pharmacist-initiated general practitioner referral of patients with suboptimal asthma management.

Authors:  Bonnie J Bereznicki; Gregory M Peterson; Shane L Jackson; Haydn Walters; Kimbra Fitzmaurice; Peter Gee
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-08-05

2.  Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys.

Authors:  M Salim Silva; W T Smith; G Bammer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Who is interpreting nuclear cardiology studies in the United States, and what are the requirements for privileges? A national survey of institutional policies from 80 major medical centers.

Authors:  V L Sorrell; W C Reeves
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Effect of timed incentives on subject participation in a study of long-term breast cancer survivors: are there ethnic differences?

Authors:  K Ashing-Giwa; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Switching Swiss enrollees from indemnity health insurance to managed care: the effect on health status and stisfaction with care.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and women.

Authors:  Pekka Jousilahti; Veikko Salomaa; Kari Kuulasmaa; Matti Niemelä; Erkki Vartiainen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

9.  Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ripley; Francis Macrina; Monika Markowitz; Chris Gennings
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment.

Authors:  Gwen L Alexander; George W Divine; Mick P Couper; Jennifer B McClure; Melanie A Stopponi; Kristine K Fortman; Dennis D Tolsma; Victor J Strecher; Christine Cole Johnson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.