Literature DB >> 8237474

Does weight-bearing exercise affect non-weight-bearing bone?

L J Tommerup1, D M Raab, T D Crenshaw, E L Smith.   

Abstract

It was previously reported that weight-bearing exercise increases femur periosteal formation in 3-year-old, 230 kg cross-bred sows. To determine if this weight-bearing exercise also stimulated non-weight-bearing bone, bone formation in the seventh rib from these same sows was measured histomorphometrically on the periosteal, endocortical, and osteonal envelopes. The sows were randomly assigned by body weight to basal (B, n = 6), control (C, n = 7), or trained (T, n = 7) groups. After 3 weeks of exercise adaptation, T walked on a treadmill for 17 weeks at 5 km/h, 20 minutes/day, 5 days/week, at 5% grade. Groups were sacrificed initially (B) or after 20 weeks (C and T). Periosteal mineral apposition rate (MAR) was calculated over 136 days. Osteonal and endocortical MAR were calculated over the 14 days prior to sacrifice. There were no effects of exercise on the periosteal or endocortical percentage double-labeled surface (dLS/BS), osteonal remodeling frequency (N.dL.On/B.Ar), or MAR in any bone envelope of the rib. In conclusion, weight-bearing exercise sufficient to stimulate periosteal formation in the femur did not activate formation in the rib. Bone response to weight-bearing exercise appears to be specific to the loaded bones.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8237474     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

1.  Focal enhancement of the skeleton to exercise correlates with responsivity of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells rather than peak external forces.

Authors:  Ian J Wallace; Gabriel M Pagnotti; Jasper Rubin-Sigler; Matthew Naeher; Lynn E Copes; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin; Brigitte Demes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Intra-skeletal vascular density in a bipedal hopping macropod with implications for analyses of rib histology.

Authors:  Tahlia J Stewart; Julien Louys; Justyna J Miszkiewicz
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.741

3.  Effect of impact exercise on bone mineral density in elderly women with low BMD: a population-based randomized controlled 30-month intervention.

Authors:  Raija Korpelainen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Jorma Heikkinen; Kalervo Väänänen; Juha Korpelainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Analysis of the effect of osteon diameter on the potential relationship of osteocyte lacuna density and osteon wall thickness.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Gunnar C Clark; Scott M Sorenson; Kevin W Taylor; Shijing Qiu
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 5.  Corticosteroid-induced bone loss. Prevention and management.

Authors:  C Picado; M Luengo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Total and regional bone mineral content in Spanish professional ballet dancers.

Authors:  A Cuesta; M Revilla; L F Villa; E R Hernández; H Rico
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Effects of unilateral strength training and detraining on bone mineral density and content in young women: a study of mechanical loading and deloading on human bones.

Authors:  I Vuori; A Heinonen; H Sievänen; P Kannus; M Pasanen; P Oja
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Impact of an obesogenic diet program on bone densitometry, micro architecture and metabolism in male rat.

Authors:  Maude Gerbaix; Lore Metz; Fabrice Mac-Way; Cédric Lavet; Christelle Guillet; Stéphane Walrand; Aurélie Masgrau; Marie-Thérèse Linossier; Laurence Vico; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.876

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.