Literature DB >> 33481185

Intra-skeletal vascular density in a bipedal hopping macropod with implications for analyses of rib histology.

Tahlia J Stewart1, Julien Louys2, Justyna J Miszkiewicz3.   

Abstract

Human ribs are thought to be less affected by mechanical strain at the microscopic level than limb bones, implying that rib remodelling better reflects bone physiological homeostasis. Here, we test the hypothesis that rib tissue will be well vascularized and thus enhance susceptibility to metabolic influence. An intra-skeletal comparison of bone vascular canal density was conducted using a macropod animal model adapted to bipedal habitual hopping. The right humerus, ulna, radius, femur, tibia, fibula, a mid-thoracic and upper-thoracic rib of an eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) were sectioned at the midshaft, from which histological sections were prepared. Bone vascularity from a maximum of 12 mm2 of sub-periosteal parallel-fibred and lamellar bone was recorded, resulting in a total of 2047 counted vessels. Vascular canal density data were corrected by cortical width, maximum length, and midshaft circumference robusticity indices computed for each bone. The fibula consistently had the highest vascular canal density, even when corrected for maximum length, cortical width and midshaft circumference robusticities. This was followed by the mid- and upper-thoracic ribs. Vascularity differences between bones were relatively consistent whether vascular canal density was controlled for by cortical width or midshaft circumference robusticities. Vascular canal density and robusticity indices were also positively and negatively correlated (p < 0.05). Results confirm that the ribs are well vascularized, which facilitates bone metabolic processes such as remodelling, but the fibula also appears to be a well vascularized bone. Future research investigating human bone metabolism will benefit from examining thoracic rib or fibula samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone and bones; Histology; Movement; Physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33481185     DOI: 10.1007/s12565-020-00601-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Int        ISSN: 1447-073X            Impact factor:   1.741


  34 in total

Review 1.  The Utah paradigm of skeletal physiology: an overview of its insights for bone, cartilage and collagenous tissue organs.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Assessment of intra- and intercostal variation in rib histomorphometry: its impact on evidentiary examination.

Authors:  Christian Crowder; Laura Rosella
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Mechanical and metabolic interactions in cortical bone development.

Authors:  Courtney D Eleazer; Rimantas Jankauskas
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Age-associated bone loss and intraskeletal variability in the Imperial Romans.

Authors:  Helen Cho; Sam Darrel Stout
Journal:  J Anthropol Sci       Date:  2011-03-15

Review 5.  Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?

Authors:  D M L Cooper; C E Kawalilak; K Harrison; B D Johnston; J D Johnston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  The effects of immobilization on vascular canal orientation in rat cortical bone.

Authors:  Hayley M Britz; Jarkko Jokihaara; Olli V Leppänen; Teppo L N Järvinen; David M L Cooper
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions.

Authors:  J D Currey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Collagen turnover in the adult femoral mid-shaft: modeled from anthropogenic radiocarbon tracer measurements.

Authors:  Robert E M Hedges; John G Clement; C David L Thomas; Tamsin C O'connell
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 9.  Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  David W Dempster; Juliet E Compston; Marc K Drezner; Francis H Glorieux; John A Kanis; Hartmut Malluche; Pierre J Meunier; Susan M Ott; Robert R Recker; A Michael Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Mechanical basis of bone strength: influence of bone material, bone structure and muscle action.

Authors:  N H Hart; S Nimphius; T Rantalainen; A Ireland; A Siafarikas; R U Newton
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.