Literature DB >> 8237321

Urban vs rural increase in hip fracture incidence. Age and sex of 901 cases 1980-89 in Olmsted County, U.S.A.

R Madhok1, L J Melton, E J Atkinson, W M O'Fallon, D G Lewallen.   

Abstract

To determine if hip fracture incidence rates are greater in urban than in rural areas of the United States, as they appear to be in Scandinavia, we undertook a study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. During the decade 1980-89, the age- and sex-adjusted incidence of proximal femur fractures among urban residents of the central city of Rochester was 36 percent greater than among residents of the rural remainder of Olmsted County. The difference was almost entirely accounted for by an excess of fractures due to moderate trauma in elderly urban women. These first detailed results from the United States confirm earlier observations from Scandinavia that hip fracture rates are lower in rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8237321     DOI: 10.3109/17453679308993689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  23 in total

1.  Comparing methods to identify hip fracture in a nursing home population using Medicare claims.

Authors:  S K Rigler; E Ellerbeck; J Whittle; J Mahnken; G Cook-Wiens; T I Shireman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The Jeremiah Metzger Lecture on the climate of cities.

Authors:  S Bondurant
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1996

Review 3.  Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  S Y Cheng; A R Levy; K A Lefaivre; P Guy; L Kuramoto; B Sobolev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Incidence of hip fracture in Shiraz, Iran.

Authors:  Mahmood Soveid; Ali Reza Serati; Masoomeh Masoompoor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Epidemiology of hip fracture in Tucuman, Argentina.

Authors:  A Wittich; A Bagur; C Mautalen; A Cristofari; O Escobar; G Carrizo; B Oliveri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Contribution of lean tissue mass to the urban-rural difference in bone mineral density.

Authors:  Chatlert Pongchaiyakul; Tuan V Nguyen; Vongsvat Kosulwat; Nipa Rojroongwasinkul; Somsri Charoenkiatkul; John A Eisman; Rajata Rajatanavin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Peak bone mineral density in Vietnamese women.

Authors:  H T T Nguyen; B von Schoultz; D M T Pham; D B Nguyen; Q H Le; D V Nguyen; A L Hirschberg; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence.

Authors:  L J Melton; A E Kearns; E J Atkinson; M E Bolander; S J Achenbach; J M Huddleston; T M Therneau; C L Leibson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Regional differences in hip bone mineral density levels in Norway: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  T K Omsland; C G Gjesdal; N Emaus; G S Tell; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.