Literature DB >> 8236857

The inverse intensity effect is not lost with stimuli in apparent motion.

E Castet1, J Lorenceau, C Bonnet.   

Abstract

The inverse relationship between the visible persistence of a briefly presented stimulus and its intensity is well established for static displays. However, with non-static displays, this relationship is only partially reported by previous studies. In order to clarify this topic, we investigated the effect of luminance on the visible persistence of a stimulus in apparent motion. Assuming that persistence duration is a normally distributed random variable, we studied whether the mean persistence of a stimulus could be systematically varied by varying its luminance. Our paradigm permits evaluation of this effect without changing the temporal interval between two successive presentations of the stimulus, thus avoiding the potential influence of this latter factor on persistence. Our results show that the inverse intensity effect still occurs at each of the successive locations of a stimulus in apparent motion. In addition, we provide evidence that increasing the spatial separation between the successive presentations, and decreasing the background luminance, result both in longer persistence duration. Altogether, these findings favour the hypothesis that persistence is actively suppressed by inhibitory interactions between adjacent neural zones.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8236857     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90035-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Apparent motion cues distort object localisation in egocentric space.

Authors:  Madeleine A Grealy; Yann Coello; Dorothy Heffernan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attenuation of perceived motion smear during vergence and pursuit tracking.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Metacontrast masking reduces the estimated duration of visible persistence.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.