Literature DB >> 35032019

Metacontrast masking reduces the estimated duration of visible persistence.

Thomas M Spalek1, Vincent Di Lollo2.   

Abstract

A brief visual display can give rise to a sensation that outlasts the duration of the physical stimulus. The duration of this visible persistence has been estimated with paradigms that require the temporal integration of two brief sequential displays (frames) separated by a blank temporal gap. Temporal integration is said to occur when the visible persistence generated by the first frame is sufficiently long to bridge the inter-frame temporal gap. The longest gap at which integration still occurs is taken as an estimate of the duration of visible persistence. In the present work, we show that the duration of visible persistence has been underestimated in at least some of the experiments involving the temporal integration of successive displays. This is because the trailing frame can act as a metacontrast mask that foreshortens the visibility of the leading frame. Specifically, we show that operations that reduce the strength of metacontrast masking yield longer estimates of visible persistence. The relationship between metacontrast masking and visible persistence had been mentioned in some individual studies, but a comprehensive examination of that relationship is currently unavailable. Finally, we show that estimates based on single displays (e.g., the Sperling paradigm) also fail to provide untainted estimates because, in single displays, visible persistence is confounded with informational persistence.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metacontrast masking; Temporal integration; Temporal persistence; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35032019     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02431-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

1.  Metacontrast.

Authors:  M ALPERN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1953-08

2.  Contour suppression during stroboscopic motion and metacontrast.

Authors:  B Breitmeyer; R Love; B Wepman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Two forms of persistence in visual information processing.

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Peter Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Are the inverse-duration and inverse-proximity effects in temporal integration subserved by independent mechanisms?

Authors:  Taylor M Cork; Nadja Jankovic; Vincent Di Lollo; Thomas M Spalek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence.

Authors:  V Di Lollo; W F Bischof
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The inverse intensity effect is not lost with stimuli in apparent motion.

Authors:  E Castet; J Lorenceau; C Bonnet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.

Authors:  B G Breitmeyer; L Ganz
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Metacontrast investigations of sustained-transient channel inhibitory interactions.

Authors:  B G Breitmeyer; M Rudd; K Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  On the relationship between stimulus intensity and duration of visible persistence.

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Disinhibition in metacontrast masking of vernier acuity targets: sustained channels inhibit transient channels.

Authors:  B G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.