Literature DB >> 8234758

New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses.

D T Lawson1, B S Wilson, C C Finley.   

Abstract

Various strategies for representing speech information with multichannel cochlear prostheses were compared in tests with implant patients. The strategies included the compressed analog (CA) approach of a standard clinical device, and alternative interleaved pulses (IP) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategies. CA and IP strategies had been compared in previous studies with a wide range of subjects. The present studies compared all three types in tests with one subject and CA and CIS strategies in tests with six additional subjects. Subjects for the present studies were selected for their excellent performance with the clinical CA processor, and the tests included closed-set identification of consonants and open-set recognition of words and sentences. For every test, every subject obtained his or her highest score, or repeated a score of 100% correct, using a CIS strategy. In the comparisons of all three approaches, IP processor scores were between those obtained with CA and CIS processors. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for processor design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8234758     DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62291-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  7 in total

1.  Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; E Duco Jansen; Mark Bendett; Jim Webb; Heather Ralph; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Heather Ralph; Jim Webb; Mark Bendett; Jonathon Wells; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  An in vitro model of a retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; Masako Kuroda; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  [Influence of "novel" speech processors on the speech perception performance of cochlear implant users].

Authors:  I Baljić
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes.

Authors:  Bruno Kenway; Yu Chuen Tam; Zebunnisa Vanat; Frances Harris; Roger Gray; John Birchall; Robert Carlyon; Patrick Axon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Aditi Agarwal; Xiaodong Tan; Yingyue Xu; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Petrina La Faire; Xiaodong Tan; Pamela Fiebig; David M Landsberger; Alan G Micco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.