Literature DB >> 8234313

Color, contrast sensitivity, and the cone mosaic.

D Williams1, N Sekiguchi, D Brainard.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the role of various stages in the human visual system in the detection of spatial patterns. Contrast sensitivity measurements were made for interference fringe stimuli in three directions in color space with a psychophysical technique that avoided blurring by the eye's optics including chromatic aberration. These measurements were compared with the performance of an ideal observer that incorporated optical factors, such as photon catch in the cone mosaic, that influence the detection of interference fringes. The comparison of human and ideal observer performance showed that neural factors influence the shape as well as the height of the foveal contrast sensitivity function for all color directions, including those that involve luminance modulation. Furthermore, when optical factors are taken into account, the neural visual system has the same contrast sensitivity for isoluminant stimuli seen by the middle-wavelength-sensitive (M) and long-wavelength-sensitive (L) cones and isoluminant stimuli seen by the short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones. Though the cone submosaics that feed these chromatic mechanisms have very different spatial properties, the later neural stages apparently have similar spatial properties. Finally, we review the evidence that cone sampling can produce aliasing distortion for gratings with spatial frequencies exceeding the resolution limit. Aliasing can be observed with gratings modulated in any of the three directions in color space we used. We discuss mechanisms that prevent aliasing in most ordinary viewing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8234313      PMCID: PMC47655          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  No aliasing at edges in normal viewing.

Authors:  S J Galvin; D R Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations.

Authors:  W S Geisler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones.

Authors:  D I MacLeod; D R Williams; W Makous
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K A Allen; K R Sloan; C L Lerea; J B Hurley; I B Klock; A H Milam
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1991-10-22       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Color as a source of information in the stereo correspondence process.

Authors:  J R Jordan; W S Geisler; A C Bovik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The physical limits of grating visibility.

Authors:  M S Banks; W S Geisler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Aberration-free measurements of the visibility of isoluminant gratings.

Authors:  N Sekiguchi; D R Williams; D H Brainard
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  R Navarro; P Artal; D R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Serial spatial filters in vision.

Authors:  B Chen; W Makous; D R Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn; J L Schnapf
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  12 in total

1.  Chromatic detection from cone photoreceptors to V1 neurons to behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Charles A Hass; Juan M Angueyra; Zachary Lindbloom-Brown; Fred Rieke; Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. I. Detection under conditions controlling for optical factors.

Authors:  Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 3.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision.

Authors:  D Osorio; M Vorobyev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Microcircuitry and mosaic of a blue-yellow ganglion cell in the primate retina.

Authors:  D J Calkins; Y Tsukamoto; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ideal observer analysis of signal quality in retinal circuits.

Authors:  Robert G Smith; Narender K Dhingra
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  The effects of longitudinal chromatic aberration and a shift in the peak of the middle-wavelength sensitive cone fundamental on cone contrast.

Authors:  F J Rucker; D Osorio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Comparison of Blue-Yellow Opponent Color Contrast Sensitivity Function between Female Badminton Players and Non-athletes.

Authors:  Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Ali Mirzajani; Maryam Hatami; Razieh Musavian; Ebrahim Abbasi
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-20

8.  Allocating structure to function: the strong links between neuroplasticity and natural selection.

Authors:  Michael L Anderson; Barbara L Finlay
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Visual function and cortical organization in carriers of blue cone monochromacy.

Authors:  Ethan A Rossi; Rebecca L Achtman; Arnaud Guidon; David R Williams; Austin Roorda; Daphne Bavelier; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Population receptive field (pRF) measurements of chromatic responses in human visual cortex using fMRI.

Authors:  Lauren E Welbourne; Antony B Morland; Alex R Wade
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.