Literature DB >> 8233735

Comparison of prophylaxis and rescue treatment with Curosurf in neonates less than 30 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial.

J Egberts1, J P de Winter, G Sedin, M J de Kleine, U Broberger, F van Bel, T Curstedt, B Robertson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the immediate effects of prophylactic administration of Curosurf and to compare outcomes after prophylactic or expectant management. STUDY
DESIGN: Porcine surfactant (Curosurf, 200 mg/kg body weight) was administered intratracheally within 10 minutes of birth to preterm neonates with a gestational age of 26 to 29 weeks (n = 75); rescue-eligible neonates (n = 72) were initially subjected to a sham maneuver. The primary end points of the trial, evaluated at the age of 6 hours, were to obtain (1) a 40% decrease in the ratio between transcutaneous oxygen tension (tcPO2) (kPa) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2), and (2) a 50% decrease in the incidence of radiologically verified respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). After 6 to 24 hours, a similar dose of surfactant was given to the neonates of both the prophylaxis and the rescue-eligible group, if they needed mechanical ventilation with an FIO2 > or = 0.6.
RESULTS: At 6 hours the prophylaxis group had, in comparison with the rescue-eligible group, significantly higher tcPO2/FIO2 ratios (mean +/- SD: 39.7 +/- 15.3 vs 28.1 +/- 18.1; P < .001) and less severe RDS by radiological scoring (chi 2 = 14.9; P = .005). Severe RDS was present in 19% of the prophylactically treated neonates versus 32% in the rescue-eligible group (P < .05). The prophylaxis group needed shorter periods of FIO2 > 0.40 than the rescue-eligible neonates (P < .01), and eight neonates of the prophylaxis group (11%) versus 23 of the rescue-eligible group (32%) qualified for rescue treatment with surfactant in the interval 6 to 24 hours (P < .01). There were no differences in the incidence or severity of pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, cerebral hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, patent ductus arteriosus, in the duration of mechanical ventilation or time in supplemental oxygen, or in mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Subgroup analysis revealed (1) that administration of corticosteroids reduced the risk of developing neonatal RDS as effectively as did surfactant prophylaxis at birth, and (2) that prophylaxis was effective especially in neonates with gestational age < 28 weeks or birth weight < 1000 g, in male neonates, and in neonates who had received no antenatal treatment with corticosteroids. Our data indicate that prophylactic treatment with surfactant should be considered in high-risk neonates fulfilling these latter criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8233735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  14 in total

1.  Care of mothers and infants.

Authors:  M E Avery
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  A risk-benefit assessment of natural and synthetic exogenous surfactants in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  H Walti; M Monset-Couchard
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Porcine-derived lung surfactant. A review of the therapeutic efficacy and clinical tolerability of a natural surfactant preparation (Curosurf) in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Appropriate surfactant usage in 1996.

Authors:  R F Soll
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Systematic review of prophylactic vs rescue surfactant.

Authors:  C J Morley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 6.  Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Felicia L Bahadue; Roger Soll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

7.  Theoretical changes in neonatal hospitalisation costs after the introduction of porcine-derived lung surfactant ('Curosurf').

Authors:  J Egberts
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Evolution of surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Smeeta Sardesai; Manoj Biniwale; Fiona Wertheimer; Arlene Garingo; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 9.  The molecular era of surfactant biology.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Whitsett
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  The short-term outcome of a large cohort of very preterm infants treated with poractant alfa (Curosurf) for respiratory distress syndrome. A postmarketing phase IV study.

Authors:  Géraldine Lamboley-Gilmert; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.