Literature DB >> 7527760

Porcine-derived lung surfactant. A review of the therapeutic efficacy and clinical tolerability of a natural surfactant preparation (Curosurf) in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

L R Wiseman1, H M Bryson.   

Abstract

Porcine-derived lung surfactant (PLS; Curosurf) has shown efficacy in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. PLS consists of phospholipids, mainly dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, the primary surface-active agent of natural lung surfactant, and pulmonary surfactant-associated proteins which facilitate spreading and adsorption of the surface-active agent at the air-alveolar interface. Intratracheal administration of a single dose of PLS 200 mg/kg significantly improves the survival rate and reduces the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days in premature infants (birthweight 700 to 2000g) with severe respiratory distress syndrome (fraction of inspired oxygen > or = 0.60). PLS also reduces the incidence of air leak events such as pulmonary interstitial emphysema and pneumothorax. The response rate may be further improved by administration of additional 100 mg/kg doses at 12-hour intervals to infants showing a poor response or relapse after a single dose. PLS prophylaxis reduces the incidence and severity of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants at high risk of developing the disease; however, it remains unclear whether the eventual clinical outcome is similar or superior to that observed in infants who receive rescue treatment. PLS is well tolerated and does not appear to increase the incidence of complications of prematurity or respiratory distress syndrome, including patent ductus arteriosus and intraventricular haemorrhage. Although its effect on long term development require further investigation, early indications are that PLS is not associated with any long term adverse sequelae. Comparative trials are clearly warranted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of PLS relative to that of other available surfactant preparations, particularly to explore preliminary indications that a more rapid effect of natural surfactants such as PLS (compared with synthetic products) may correlate with improved clinical outcomes, and that PLS may result in fewer complications than synthetic preparations. Thus, available data show PLS to be a very effective agent for the treatment and prophylaxis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and that it may have some advantages over synthetic preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7527760     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199448030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  56 in total

1.  Factors influencing the clinical response to surfactant replacement therapy in babies with severe respiratory distress syndrome. Collaborative European Multicentre Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Prolonged ventilation of the premature newborn rabbit after treatment with natural or apoprotein-based artificial surfactant.

Authors:  B Robertson; T Curstedt; G Grossmann; T Kobayashi; M Kokubo; Y Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Surfactant replacement therapy for severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: an international randomized clinical trial. Collaborative European Multicenter Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Radiographic features of pulmonary oxygen toxicity in the newborn: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  W H Northway; R C Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Surfactant improves lung function and morphology in newborn rabbits with meconium aspiration.

Authors:  B Sun; T Curstedt; G W Song; B Robertson
Journal:  Biol Neonate       Date:  1993

6.  Lung gas volumes and expiratory time constant in immature newborn rabbits treated with natural or synthetic surfactant or detergents.

Authors:  S Bongrani; M Fornasier; M Papotti; R Razzetti; B Robertson
Journal:  Biol Neonate       Date:  1994

7.  Multicentre randomised trial comparing high and low dose surfactant regimens for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (the Curosurf 4 trial).

Authors:  H L Halliday; W O Tarnow-Mordi; J D Corcoran; C C Patterson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  A multicenter randomized trial comparing two surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.

Authors:  J D Horbar; L L Wright; R F Soll; E C Wright; A A Fanaroff; S B Korones; S Shankaran; W Oh; B D Fletcher; C R Bauer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Surfactant-anti-surfactant immune complexes in infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  D S Strayer; T A Merritt; J Lwebuga-Mukasa; M Hallman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome treated with the isolated phospholipid fraction of natural surfactant.

Authors:  G Noack; P Berggren; T Curstedt; G Grossmann; P Herin; W Mortensson; R Nilsson; B Robertson
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1987-09
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Calfactant: a review of its use in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  S V Onrust; M Dooley; K L Goa
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Lung surfactants for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: animal-derived or synthetic agents?

Authors:  Gautham K Suresh; Roger F Soll
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Theoretical changes in neonatal hospitalisation costs after the introduction of porcine-derived lung surfactant ('Curosurf').

Authors:  J Egberts
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Natural vs synthetic surfactants in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  H L Halliday
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Treatment of severe meconium aspiration syndrome with porcine surfactant. Collaborative Surfactant Study Group.

Authors:  H L Halliday; C P Speer; B Robertson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Lipid peroxidation of lung surfactant in experimental neonatal group B streptococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  R K L Bouhafs; C Jarstrand; B Robertson
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.584

7.  The short-term outcome of a large cohort of very preterm infants treated with poractant alfa (Curosurf) for respiratory distress syndrome. A postmarketing phase IV study.

Authors:  Géraldine Lamboley-Gilmert; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Aaron J Heffernan; Fekade B Sime; Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly Lim; Saiyuri Naicker; Katherine T Andrews; David Ellwood; Jeffrey Lipman; Keith Grimwood; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2021-04-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.