Literature DB >> 8233562

Comparison of the effects of immune killing mechanisms on Trypanosoma brucei parasites of slender and stumpy morphology.

L M McLintock1, C M Turner, K Vickerman.   

Abstract

Trypanosoma brucei slender forms predominate over stumpy forms as the parasite population grows but at the peak of a parasitaemic wave and during remission of infection stumpy forms predominate. To determine whether this change in predominance might be caused by selective killing of slender forms, the fates of slender and stumpy form trypanosomes in two in vitro assays of immune-mediated killing were compared. Parasite populations in which > 90% of cells were of slender morphology were observed to be killed by antibody-dependent complement-mediated lysis approximately five times faster than populations in which < 15% of cells were slender and most were of intermediate or stumpy morphology. Quantification of the relationship between the proportion of slender forms in the population and the rate of lysis indicated that slender forms were killed approximately 7.3 times faster than other forms. In an opsonization assay, no differences were observed between slender and stumpy forms in the extent to which they attached to macrophages in an antibody-dependent manner. These results suggest that the change in proportions of slender and stumpy forms at the peak of a parasitaemic wave results from slender forms being more susceptible to complement-mediated killing as the antibody response develops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8233562     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1993.tb00633.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasite Immunol        ISSN: 0141-9838            Impact factor:   2.280


  20 in total

1.  Limitation of Trypanosoma brucei parasitaemia results from density-dependent parasite differentiation and parasite killing by the host immune response.

Authors:  K M Tyler; P G Higgs; K R Matthews; K Gull
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parasite-intrinsic factors can explain ordered progression of trypanosome antigenic variation.

Authors:  Katrina A Lythgoe; Liam J Morrison; Andrew F Read; J David Barry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Immunobiology of African trypanosomes: need of alternative interventions.

Authors:  Toya Nath Baral
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-23

4.  The bloodstream differentiation-division of Trypanosoma brucei studied using mitochondrial markers.

Authors:  K M Tyler; K R Matthews; K Gull
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Cellular and molecular remodeling of the endocytic pathway during differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms.

Authors:  Benoit Vanhollebeke; Pierrick Uzureau; Daniel Monteyne; David Pérez-Morga; Etienne Pays
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-06-25

Review 6.  Trypanosomal immune evasion, chronicity and transmission: an elegant balancing act.

Authors:  Paula MacGregor; Balazs Szöőr; Nicholas J Savill; Keith R Matthews
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  Calflagin inhibition prolongs host survival and suppresses parasitemia in Trypanosoma brucei infection.

Authors:  Brian T Emmer; Melvin D Daniels; Joann M Taylor; Conrad L Epting; David M Engman
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-04-23

Review 8.  New discoveries in the transmission biology of sleeping sickness parasites: applying the basics.

Authors:  Paula MacGregor; Keith R Matthews
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Restless gossamers: antibody clearance by hydrodynamic flow forces generated at the surface of motile trypanosome parasites.

Authors:  Samuel D Dean; Keith R Matthews
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 21.023

10.  Transmission stages dominate trypanosome within-host dynamics during chronic infections.

Authors:  Paula MacGregor; Nicholas J Savill; Deborah Hall; Keith R Matthews
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 21.023

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.