Literature DB >> 8224059

Egocentric references and human spatial orientation in microgravity. II. Body-centred coordinates in the task of drawing ellipses with prescribed orientation.

V S Gurfinkel1, F Lestienne, K E Popov, L Lefort.   

Abstract

This article describes the results of the "ellipses" experiment conducted during the second French-Soviet spaceflight (project Aragatz). The realization of oriented motor tasks, on the basis of internal body representation and without visual feedback, was chosen as a paradigm for studying the determinants of spatial orientation under weightlessness. The process of drawing ellipses in the air, using arm movements with axes parallel or perpendicular to the longitudinal body axis, was studied under normal gravity and in weightlessness, and recorded using a video computer motion-analyzing system (Kinesigraph). On Earth, the experiments were performed in standing and lying positions, and in flight, in the erect position with the feet fixed to the floor. In general, performance of the task in microgravity was not disturbed. Under conditions of spaceflight, the longitudinal ellipse was inclined forward in accordance with the inclination of the whole body relative to the fixed feet. On Earth, the angle between the long axes of longitudinal and transverse ellipses deviated from 90 degrees by 20-30 degrees. The same deviation persisted under microgravity conditions. The distinctive features of ellipses traced by individual subjects were also preserved. It is concluded that an egocentric reference system ensures normal performance of sensorimotor tasks in the absence of a gravitational reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8224059     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  How to explain a constant subjective vertical at constant high speed rotation about an earth-horizontal axis.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt; S Glasauer; G Gralla; M L Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1989

2.  Spatial reference in weightlessness: perceptual factors and mental representations.

Authors:  A D Friederici; W J Levelt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

3.  Coordination of arm movements in three-dimensional space. Sensorimotor mapping during drawing movement.

Authors:  J F Soechting; F Lacquaniti; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Experimental M-131--human vestibular function.

Authors:  E F Miller; A Graybiel
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1973-06

5.  Spatial orientation in weightlessness and readaptation to earth's gravity.

Authors:  L R Young; C M Oman; D G Watt; K E Money; B K Lichtenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness.

Authors:  G Clément; V S Gurfinkel; F Lestienne; M I Lipshits; K E Popov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Space motion sickness: phenomenology, countermeasures, and mechanisms.

Authors:  E I Matsnev; I Y Yakovleva; I K Tarasov; V N Alekseev; L N Kornilova; A D Mateev; G I Gorgiladze
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1983-04

8.  A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1983-06

9.  Vestibular experiments in Gemini flights V and VII.

Authors:  A Graybiel; E F Miller; J Billingham; R Waite; C A Berry; L F Dietlein
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1967-04

10.  Inversion illusion in parabolic flight: its probable dependence on otolith function.

Authors:  A Graybiel; R S Kellogg
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1967-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceived versus actual head-on-trunk orientation during arm movement control.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jordan Navarro; Frédéric Ferrero; Jacques Cremieux; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Is perception of upper body orientation based on the inertia tensor? Normogravity versus microgravity conditions.

Authors:  N Gueguen; T Coyle; C Craig; R Bootsma; L Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Relation between gravitational and arm-movement direction in the mechanism of perception in bimanual steering.

Authors:  Taiji Sakajiri; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Akihito Sano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dry immersion as a model of deafferentation: A neurophysiology study using somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Blandine Acket; Liubov Amirova; Angelique Gerdelat; Pascal Cintas; Marc-Antoine Custaud; Anne Pavy-LeTraon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Effect of Acute Body Unloading on Somatosensory Performance, Motor Activation, and Visuomotor Tasks.

Authors:  Ashleigh Marchant; Nick Ball; Jeremy Witchalls; Gordon Waddington; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Individual predictors of sensorimotor adaptability.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg; Brian T Peters
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-06

Review 8.  Towards human exploration of space: the THESEUS review series on neurophysiology research priorities.

Authors:  Olivier White; Gilles Clément; Jacques-Olivier Fortrat; Anne Pavy-LeTraon; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Stéphane Blanc; Floris L Wuyts; William H Paloski
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.415

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.