Literature DB >> 8223527

Oxygen deficits incurred during 45, 60, 75 and 90-s maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer.

R T Withers1, G Van der Ploeg, J P Finn.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine the most appropriate duration for the measurement of the maximal accumulated O2 deficit (MAOD), which is analogous to the anaerobic capacity, to ascertain the effects of mass, fat free mass (FFM), leg volume (Vleg) and lower body volume (V1b) on anaerobic test performance, to examine the reproducibility for peak power output (Wpeak) or maximal anaerobic power using an air-braked cycle ergometer and to produce approximations for the percentages of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism during exercise of short duration but high intensity. A group of 12 endurance trained cyclists [mean age 25.1 (SD 4.6) years; mean body mass 73.43 (SD 7.12) kg; mean maximal oxygen consumption 5.12 (SD 0.35) l.min-1; mean body fat 12.5 (SD 4.1) %] accordingly performed four counterbalanced treatments of 45, 60, 75 and 90 s of maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer. The mean O2 deficit of 3.52 l for the 45-s treatment was significantly less (P < 0.01) than those for the 60 (3.75 l), 75 (3.80 l) and 90-s (3.75 l) treatments. These data therefore indicate that in predominantly aerobically trained subjects the O2 deficit attains a plateau after 60 s of maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer. Statistically significant interclass correlation coefficients (P < 0.05) between the anthropometric variables (mass, FFM, Vleg and Vlb) and Wpeak or maximal anaerobic power (0.624-0.748) and MAOD (ml) or anaerobic capacity (0.666-0.772) furthermore would suggest the relevance of taking into account muscle mass during anaerobic tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8223527     DOI: 10.1007/bf00376665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  15 in total

1.  The maximally accumulated oxygen deficit as an indicator of anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  C B Scott; F B Roby; T G Lohman; J C Bunt
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Muscle metabolism during 30, 60 and 90 s of maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer.

Authors:  R T Withers; W M Sherman; D G Clark; P C Esselbach; S R Nolan; M H Mackay; M Brinkman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

3.  Relative importance of aerobic and anaerobic energy release during short-lasting exhausting bicycle exercise.

Authors:  J I Medbø; I Tabata
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-11

4.  Muscle metabolites and oxygen deficit with exercise in hypoxia and hyperoxia.

Authors:  D Linnarsson; J Karlsson; L Fagraeus; B Saltin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Semiautomated systems approach to the assessment of oxygen uptake during exercise.

Authors:  J H Wilmore; D L Costill
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 6.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Anaerobic energy production and O2 deficit-debt relationship during exhaustive exercise in humans.

Authors:  J Bangsbo; P D Gollnick; T E Graham; C Juel; B Kiens; M Mizuno; B Saltin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Disposal of lactate during and after strenuous exercise in humans.

Authors:  P O Astrand; E Hultman; A Juhlin-Dannfelt; G Reynolds
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1986-07

9.  Tests of anaerobic alactacid and lactacid capacities: description and reliability.

Authors:  J A Simoneau; G Lortie; M R Boulay; C Bouchard
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1983-12

10.  Specificity of test duration when assessing the anaerobic lactacid capacity of high-performance track cyclists.

Authors:  N P Craig; F S Pyke; K I Norton
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.118

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Characteristics of track cycling.

Authors:  N P Craig; K I Norton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Validity of the two-parameter model in estimating the anaerobic work capacity.

Authors:  J Dekerle; G Brickley; A J P Hammond; J S M Pringle; H Carter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Validation of a field test to determine the maximal aerobic power in triathletes and endurance cyclists.

Authors:  C González-Haro; P A Galilea; F Drobnic; J F Escanero
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Can Aerobic and Anaerobic Power be Measured in a 60-Second Maximal Test?

Authors:  Daniel G Carey; Mark T Richardson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 5.  The maximal accumulated oxygen deficit method: a valid and reliable measure of anaerobic capacity?

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Jos J de Koning; Carl Foster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Aerobic glycolytic and aerobic lipolytic power systems. A new paradigm with implications for endurance and ultraendurance events.

Authors:  J A Hawley; W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Variable resistance all-out test to generate accumulated oxygen deficit and predict anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  P B Gastin; D L Lawson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

Review 8.  Energy system interaction and relative contribution during maximal exercise.

Authors:  P B Gastin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Reliability of power in physical performance tests.

Authors:  W G Hopkins; E J Schabort; J A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Strength training improves supramaximal cycling but not anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  Clare Minahan; Catherine Wood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.