Literature DB >> 6652864

Tests of anaerobic alactacid and lactacid capacities: description and reliability.

J A Simoneau, G Lortie, M R Boulay, C Bouchard.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is 1) to describe maximal anaerobic alactacid (AAC) and lactacid (ALC) capacity test and 2) to determine their reliabilities in men and women. The subjects were submitted to either a 10-s (2 trials) or a 90-s (1 trial) all-out ergocycle test for AAC and ALC respectively. Thirty-four male and 24 female subjects were tested for AAC, while 21 males and 19 females took part in the ALC test. A modified bicycle ergometer allowed the exact measurement of the distance and the work load for the computation of the work performed. load for the computation of the work performed. Each subject was tested and retested within 7 days. In both AAC and ALC, male subjects performed more work than women. AAC was 108 +/- 16 (mean +/- SD) and 90 +/- 14 J/kg for males and females respectively while ALC was 486 +/- 50 and 377 +/- 34 J/kg. Although the work load was designed to be 0.09 kp/kg for the AAC and 0.05 kp/kg for the ALC tests, there were wide variations between subjects with respect to the optimal load (AAC: from 0.05 to 0.11; ALC: from 0.03 to 0.06 kp/kg). Reproducibility was consistently high, with intraclass correlations of 0.98 and 0.99 for AAC (AAC-Max) and ALC respectively, with no difference between the male and female subgroups. It is concluded that these AAC and ALC tests, designed under assumptions of face validity, allow for differences between males and females and are highly repeatable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6652864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci        ISSN: 0700-3978


  9 in total

1.  Heredity and trainability of aerobic and anaerobic performances. An update.

Authors:  C Bouchard; M R Boulay; J A Simoneau; G Lortie; L Pérusse
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Measurement of anaerobic work capacities in humans.

Authors:  S Green
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Influence of training status on maximal accumulated oxygen deficit during all-out cycle exercise.

Authors:  P B Gastin; D L Lawson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

Review 5.  Reliability of power in physical performance tests.

Authors:  W G Hopkins; E J Schabort; J A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans. Definitions, limitations and unsolved problems.

Authors:  S Green; B Dawson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Effects of two high-intensity intermittent training programs interspaced by detraining on human skeletal muscle and performance.

Authors:  J A Simoneau; G Lortie; M R Boulay; M Marcotte; M C Thibault; C Bouchard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

8.  Oxygen deficits incurred during 45, 60, 75 and 90-s maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer.

Authors:  R T Withers; G Van der Ploeg; J P Finn
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

9.  Effects of 7-day intake of hydrogen-rich water on physical performance of trained and untrained subjects.

Authors:  Rafael Timón; Guillermo Olcina; Adrian González-Custodio; Marta Camacho-Cardenosa; Alba Camacho-Cardenosa; Ismael Martínez Guardado
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.806

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.