Literature DB >> 8222108

Influence of serum cholesterol and other coronary risk factors on vasomotion of angiographically normal coronary arteries.

C Seiler1, O M Hess, M Buechi, T M Suter, H P Krayenbuehl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that there is impairment of the vasodilatory response to acetylcholine in patients with hypercholesterolemia and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Moreover, in patients with angiographically smooth coronary arteries, the number of coronary risk factors is associated with a loss of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. The purpose of the present analysis was to evaluate in patients with and without coronary artery disease coronary vasomotor response to dynamic exercise in angiographically normal and stenosed coronary arteries and to relate the response to serum cholesterol levels as well as to other coronary risk factors. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Luminal area change during exercise (delta-ex, percent change compared with rest = 100%) was determined by biplane quantitative coronary arteriography in three groups: Group 1 consisted of 14 patients with normal total serum cholesterol of < 200 mg/100 mL; mean, 173 mg/100 mL (mean age, 51 years). Group 2 comprised 23 patients with a slightly elevated cholesterol of 200 to 250 mg/100 mL; mean, 223 mg/100 mL (mean age, 53 years). Group 3 had 24 patients with markedly elevated cholesterol of > 250 mg/100 mL; mean, 288 mg/100 mL (mean age, 54 years). Serum cholesterol levels and categorical risk factors such as positive family history, history of hypertension, smoking, obesity, and diabetes were related to exercise-induced vasomotor response. The three groups did not differ with regard to clinical characteristics, exercise work load, and hemodynamic data measured during exercise. However, delta-ex in normal vessels was significantly different between all three groups (ANOVA, P < .01): +31% (group 1), +18% (group 2), and +4% (group 3). Delta-ex in stenotic vessels did not differ between the groups: -5% (group 1), -13% (group 2), and -12% (group 3). Delta-ex of the nonstenosed vessel correlated significantly and inversely with total cholesterol, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, with the ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and with the number of coronary risk factors present in a patient. High total cholesterol and a history of hypertension were independent risk factors for impaired coronary vasomotion.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with and without coronary artery disease, hypercholesterolemia and a history of hypertension independently impair exercise-induced coronary vasodilation in angiographically normal coronary arteries. In the stenotic vessel, vasomotion during exercise does not appear to be influenced by the actual serum cholesterol. The precise mechanism by which the impaired vasomotion of the angiographically normal coronary arteries is mediated is unknown, but a direct negative effect of hypercholesterolemia on endothelial function or early undetected atherosclerosis appears to be the most likely explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8222108     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  16 in total

Review 1.  The assessment of endothelial function in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in patients with risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D Hasdai; A Lerman
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Estimation of coronary flow reserve: can SPECT compete with other modalities?

Authors:  G T Gullberg; E V Di Bella; A J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  The value of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  W Wijns; P G Camici
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  How to standardize vasomotor tone in serial studies based on quantitation of coronary dimensions?

Authors:  S Jost; C W Nolte; M Sturm; J Hausleiter; D Hausmann
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-12

Review 5.  Methodological aspects of physical activity assessment in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  M A Pols; P H Peeters; H C Kemper; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Relation between aortic stiffness and coronary flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D Fukuda; M Yoshiyama; K Shimada; H Yamashita; S Ehara; Y Nakamura; K Kamimori; A Tanaka; T Kawarabayashi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Benefits and risks of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the prevention of coronary heart disease: a reappraisal.

Authors:  T R Pedersen; J A Tobert
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Could a high-fat diet rich in unsaturated fatty acids impair the cardiovascular system?

Authors:  Emiliano Medei; Ana Paula Lima-Leopoldo; Pedro Paulo Pereira-Junior; André Soares Leopoldo; Dijon Henrique Salomé Campos; Juliana Montani Raimundo; Roberto Takashi Sudo; Gisele Zapata-Sudo; Thiago Bruder-Nascimento; Sandra Cordellini; José Hamilton Matheus Nascimento; Antonio Carlos Cicogna
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Major depression and coronary flow reserve detected by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Viola Vaccarino; John Votaw; Tracy Faber; Emir Veledar; Nancy V Murrah; Linda R Jones; Jinying Zhao; Shaoyong Su; Jack Goldberg; J Paolo Raggi; Arshed A Quyyumi; David S Sheps; J Douglas Bremner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-12

Review 10.  Will 3-dimensional PET-CT enable the routine quantification of myocardial blood flow?

Authors:  Robert A deKemp; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.