Literature DB >> 8221051

Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Dissociated effects of residual spatial neglect.

S Chieffi1, M Gentilucci, A Allport, E Sasso, G Rizzolatti.   

Abstract

In the present study we investigated the possibility of a dissociation between the visual control of reaching and the visual control of grasping in a prehension task. To this purpose we studied the kinematics of prehension movements in a patient with a right parietal lesion and in six right-handed healthy control subjects. The task we used was one in which the subjects had to reach and grasp target objects in the presence or absence of a simultaneously presented distractor object. All stimuli were presented in the space ipsilateral to the lesion. The distractor could be either of the same or different size to the target object and was presented either to the right or to the left of the target. The following parameters of the prehension 'transport' component were analysed: wrist trajectory, transport time, tangential peak velocity, acceleration. Maximal finger aperture, time to maximal finger aperture, peak acceleration and time to peak acceleration of grip aperture were the parameters of the 'grasping' component analysed. The results showed that, although the patient had no misreaching, her hand trajectory deviated abnormally towards the distractor position when the distractor was to the right (ipsilateral) side of the target. In contrast, the grasp kinematics was not affected by the distractors, even when the size of the right distractor was different from the target. It appears, therefore, that the attentional shift towards the ipsilesional side, typical of neglect patients, determines a surprising dissociation in motor control. In the presence of a right distractor, the patient plans and partially executes a reaching movement towards that object and simultaneously performs a grasping movement towards a second object, i.e. the centrally located target. The presentation of distractors had no effects on the prehension kinematics of the control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8221051     DOI: 10.1093/brain/116.5.1119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  16 in total

1.  Dopaminergic effects on the implicit processing of distractor objects in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Bonfiglioli; R F Peppard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Psychoanatomical substrates of Bálint's syndrome.

Authors:  M Rizzo; S P Vecera
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Object familiarity affects finger shaping during grasping of fruit stalks.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  On the relations between affordance and representation of the agent's effector.

Authors:  Filippo Barbieri; Antimo Buonocore; Paolo Bernardis; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Arzi; Y Rossetti; Y Paulignan; C Urquizar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Unconscious updating of grasp motor program.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; E Daprati; I Toni; S Chieffi; M C Saetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics.

Authors:  S R Jackson; G M Jackson; J Rosicky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness.

Authors:  R D McIntosh; K I McClements; I Schindler; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; A D Milner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.