Literature DB >> 8220974

Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.

G M Blake1, J C Parker, F M Buxton, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

The recent introduction of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems with fan beam instead of conventional pencil beam scanning geometry represents a significant technical advance in bone densitometry. This report describes phantom and in-vivo studies of the effect of the change in beam configuration on DXA measurements. Fan beam and pencil beam measurements acquired on one of the new generation scanners, the Hologic QDR-2000, were compared with scans performed on an earlier pencil beam model, the Hologic QDR-1000. The variation with height above the scanning table of fan beam measurements of an anthropomorphic spine phantom were: bone mineral content (BMC): -3.1% cm-1; projected area (AREA): -2.8% cm-1; bone mineral density (BMD): -0.2% cm-1. For pencil beam scans the magnitude of height variation was less than 0.1% cm-1. QDR-2000 fan and pencil beam scan results for 20 volunteers correlated closely with QDR-1000 pencil beam data (r = 0.966-0.998). For BMD measurements on the spine and hip, differences between fan and pencil beam data were consistent with the errors expected from measurement precision. For AREA and BMC data, however, larger differences were observed with individual deviations which correlated with body habitus of the subjects. Although the change from pencil to fan beam geometry significantly affected AREA and BMC data, the effect on the clinically more important BMD measurements was negligibly small.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8220974     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-790-902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements.

Authors:  R Rajamanohara; J Robinson; J Rymer; R Patel; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Assessment of bone mass following renal transplantation in children.

Authors:  Mary B Leonard
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis.

Authors:  V Boudousq; D Mariano Goulart; J M Dinten; C Caderas de Kerleau; E Thomas; O Mares; P O Kotzki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.

Authors:  E Spector; A LeBlanc; L Shackelford
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M A Sabin; G M Blake; S M MacLaughlin-Black; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Bone metabolism after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjects.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Jodi N Dowthwaite; Tamara A Scerpella; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Bone loss after bariatric surgery: discordant results between DXA and QCT bone density.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu; Mary L Bouxsein; Adam E Roy; Chantel Baldwin; Abby Cange; Robert M Neer; Lee M Kaplan; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.