Literature DB >> 8218436

Genetic variation in outbred rats and mice and its implications for toxicological screening.

M F Festing1.   

Abstract

There are two basic types of laboratory rodent used in toxicological screening. Isogenic (inbred) strains are rather like clones of genetically identical individuals whereas outbred stocks are usually more variable, though the amount of variability depends on the previous history of the colony. In some cases outbred stocks may be genetically quite uniform. Many different strains of both types are available. Both types and a variety of strains are used for toxicological screening. There is clear evidence of important genetic variation both in spontaneous disease and in response to toxic agents, yet little account is taken of this in choosing suitable animals. Three options appear to be available. The first is to ignore genetic variation and use a single isogenic strain. However, if the strain happens to be insensitive to the test chemical, a toxic chemical may be judged to be relatively safe. The second option would be to synthesize a genetically heterogeneous stock by crossing two or more strains. However, this could lead to both increased false positive and false negative results as experimental "noise" either obscures true treatment effects, or is mistaken for a treatment effect. The third option is to use more than one strain, but without increasing the total number of animals used. This would provide a broad range of genotypes, so reducing the chance that they are all insensitive, without increasing experimental noise. This appears to be the only sensible way of broadening the genetic base in toxicological screening. Where strain differences are found, they may provide a tool for studying toxic mechanisms, which may be helpful in extrapolating to human populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8218436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anim Sci        ISSN: 0939-8600


  16 in total

Review 1.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Immune responses to the real world.

Authors:  Caroline J Zeiss; Cory F Brayton
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 3.  The relevance of inter- and intrastrain differences in mice and rats and their implications for models of seizures and epilepsy.

Authors:  Wolfgang Löscher; Russell J Ferland; Thomas N Ferraro
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.937

4.  Differential acquisition of lever pressing in inbred and outbred mice: comparison of one-lever and two-lever procedures and correlation with differences in locomotor activity.

Authors:  Todd L McKerchar; Troy J Zarcone; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effect of ramosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist on the severity of seizures and memory impairment in electrical amygdala kindled rats.

Authors:  Zeynab Sayahi; Alireza Komaki; Masoud Saidi Jam; Seyed Asaad Karimi; Safoura Raoufi; Parastoo Mardani; Marzieh Naderishahab; Abdolrahman Sarihi; Javad Mirnajafi-Zadeh
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Strain specific effects of low level lead exposure on associative learning and memory in rats.

Authors:  Megha Verma; J S Schneider
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Simulated childbirth injuries in an inbred rat strain.

Authors:  Lynn L Woo; Adonis Hijaz; Hui Q Pan; Mei Kuang; Raymond R Rackley; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Alternatives to statistical decision trees in regulatory (eco-)toxicological bioassays.

Authors:  Felix M Kluxen; Ludwig A Hothorn
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Bisphenol F Exposure in Adolescent Heterogeneous Stock Rats Affects Growth and Adiposity.

Authors:  Valerie A Wagner; Karen C Clark; Leslie Carrillo-Sáenz; Katie A Holl; Miriam Velez-Bermudez; Derek Simonsen; Justin L Grobe; Kai Wang; Andrew Thurman; Leah C Solberg Woods; Hans-Joachim Lehmler; Anne E Kwitek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Use of a multistrain assay could improve the NTP carcinogenesis bioassay.

Authors:  M F Festing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.