Literature DB >> 16596969

Differential acquisition of lever pressing in inbred and outbred mice: comparison of one-lever and two-lever procedures and correlation with differences in locomotor activity.

Todd L McKerchar1, Troy J Zarcone, Stephen C Fowler.   

Abstract

Recent progress in mouse genetics has led to an increased interest in developing procedures for assessing mouse behavior, but relatively few of the behavioral procedures developed involve positively reinforced operant behavior. When operant methods are used, nose poking, not lever pressing, is the target response. In the current study differential acquisition of milk-reinforced lever pressing was observed in five inbred strains (C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, 129X1/SvJ, C3H/HeJ, and BALB/cJ) and one outbred stock (CD-1) of mice. Regardless of whether one or two levers (an "operative" and "inoperative" lever) were in the operant chamber, a concomitant variable-time fixed-ratio schedule of milk reinforcement established lever pressing in the majority of mice within two 120-min sessions. Substantial differences in lever pressing were observed across mice and between procedures. Adding an inoperative lever retarded acquisition in C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, 129X1/SvJ, and C3H/HeJ mice, but not in CD-1 and BALB/cJ mice. Locomotor activity was positively correlated with number of lever presses in both procedures. Analyses of durations of the subcomponents (e.g., time to move from hopper to lever) of operant behavior revealed further differences among the six types of mice. Together, the data suggest that appetitively reinforced lever pressing can be acquired rapidly in mice and that a combination of procedural, behavioral, and genetic variables contributes to this acquisition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16596969      PMCID: PMC1389771          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.95-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

Review 1.  Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research.

Authors:  M F Festing
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of the frontal cortex in the mouse in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine.

Authors:  R Karler; J B Bedingfield; D K Thai; L D Calder
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Hyperactivity and learning deficits in transgenic mice bearing a human mutant thyroid hormone beta1 receptor gene.

Authors:  M P McDonald; R Wong; G Goldstein; B Weintraub; S Y Cheng; J N Crawley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Response-independent events in the behavior stream.

Authors:  K A Lattal; J Abreu-Rodrigues
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Genealogies of mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  J A Beck; S Lloyd; M Hafezparast; M Lennon-Pierce; J T Eppig; M F Festing; E M Fisher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment.

Authors:  J C Crabbe; D Wahlsten; B C Dudek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The effects of cocaine on operant responding for food in several strains of mice.

Authors:  C J Heyser; J S McDonald; V Beauchamp; G F Koob; L H Gold
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of chlorpromazine on rats' acquisition of lever-press responding with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  T Byrne; M G Lesage; A Poling
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  An automated learning and memory model in mice: pharmacological and behavioral evaluation of an autoshaped response.

Authors:  K E Vanover; J E Barrett
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.293

View more
  10 in total

1.  Exposure of adolescent mice to 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone increases the psychostimulant, rewarding and reinforcing effects of cocaine in adulthood.

Authors:  R López-Arnau; M A Luján; L Duart-Castells; D Pubill; J Camarasa; O Valverde; E Escubedo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Sustained attention in mice: expanding the translational utility of the SAT by incorporating the Michigan Controlled Access Response Port (MICARP).

Authors:  Megan St Peters; Ajeesh Koshy Cherian; Marc Bradshaw; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats and 15 mouse strains.

Authors:  Morgane Thomsen; S Barak Caine
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Pairings of lever and food induce Pavlovian conditioned approach of sign-tracking and goal-tracking in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Arthur Tomie; Michelle Lincks; Steffi D Nadarajah; Larissa A Pohorecky; Lei Yu
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Appetitive operant conditioning in mice: heritability and dissociability of training stages.

Authors:  Hemi A I Malkki; Laura A B Donga; Sabine E de Groot; Francesco P Battaglia; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Evaluation of study design variables and their impact on food-maintained operant responding in mice.

Authors:  Desirae M Haluk; Kevin Wickman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  MsrA knockout mouse exhibits abnormal behavior and brain dopamine levels.

Authors:  Derek B Oien; Greg L Osterhaus; Shaheen A Latif; Jonathan W Pinkston; Jenny Fulks; Michael Johnson; Stephen C Fowler; Jackob Moskovitz
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Impaired spine formation and learning in GPCR kinase 2 interacting protein-1 (GIT1) knockout mice.

Authors:  Prashanthi Menon; Rashid Deane; Abhay Sagare; Steven M Lane; Troy J Zarcone; Michael R O'Dell; Chen Yan; Berislav V Zlokovic; Bradford C Berk
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  A new mouse model of ADHD for medication development.

Authors:  Petra Majdak; John R Ossyra; Jessica M Ossyra; Adam J Cobert; Gabrielle C Hofmann; Stephen Tse; Brent Panozzo; Elizabeth L Grogan; Anastassia Sorokina; Justin S Rhodes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genetic variation and population substructure in outbred CD-1 mice: implications for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Kimberly A Aldinger; Greta Sokoloff; David M Rosenberg; Abraham A Palmer; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.