Literature DB >> 8216939

Crystal packing effects on A-DNA helix parameters: a comparative study of the isoforms of the tetragonal & hexagonal family of octamers with differing base sequences.

B Ramakrishnan1, M Sundaralingam.   

Abstract

The helix and base pair parameters of A-DNA octamers have been compared having different base sequences both in the tetragonal and hexagonal crystal systems. For the eight structures in the tetragonal family, the twist, rise, slide, inclination and tilt are essentially the same, influenced by the similarity in crystal packing. The propeller twist and the base pair buckle display small sequence dependent variations. But the base pair roll appears to be changed by the specific intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. For four of the five octamer structures in the hexagonal family, the base pair rise, slide, inclination, tilt, as well as the propeller twist and buckle are all very similar, while the twist angle and the base pair roll are not. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions seem to be primarily responsible for the differences in the roll angle in the tetragonal structures but for both the roll and twist angles in the hexagonal structures. These results demonstrate that the majority of the observed helix base pair parameters for A-DNA octamers in crystals are affected by the crystal packing environment, while a few parameters, like propeller twist and base pair buckle display some base sequence dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8216939     DOI: 10.1080/07391102.1993.10508706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn        ISSN: 0739-1102


  9 in total

1.  Local conformational variations observed in B-DNA crystals do not improve base stacking: computational analysis of base stacking in a d(CATGGGCCCATG)(2) B<-->A intermediate crystal structure.

Authors:  J Poner; J Florián; H L Ng; J E Poner; N Packová
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the d(CCAACGTTGG)(2) decamer: influence of the crystal environment.

Authors:  D R Bevan; L Li; L G Pedersen; T A Darden
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  B-form to A-form conversion by a 3'-terminal ribose: crystal structure of the chimera d(CCACTAGTG)r(G).

Authors:  M C Wahl; M Sundaralingam
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  How sequence defines structure: a crystallographic map of DNA structure and conformation.

Authors:  Franklin A Hays; Amy Teegarden; Zebulon J R Jones; Michael Harms; Dustin Raup; Jeffrey Watson; Emily Cavaliere; P Shing Ho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A molecular level picture of the stabilization of A-DNA in mixed ethanol-water solutions.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; M F Crowley; T Fox; P A Kollman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparative analysis of inosine-substituted duplex DNA by circular dichroism and X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Justin P Peters; Ewa A Kowal; Pradeep S Pallan; Martin Egli; L James Maher
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2017-09-04

7.  Polarizable Force Field for DNA Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator: II. Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Duplex DNA.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Structure of d(CCCCGGTACCGGGG)2 at 1.65 Å resolution.

Authors:  Monica Purushothaman; Anna Varghese; Pradeep Kumar Mandal; Namasivayam Gautham
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.056

9.  The structural plasticity of nucleic acid duplexes revealed by WAXS and MD.

Authors:  Weiwei He; Yen-Lin Chen; Lois Pollack; Serdal Kirmizialtin
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.