Literature DB >> 8214736

Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring.

E R Schmid1, D R Spahn, M Tornic.   

Abstract

A new generation continuous-wave transesophageal Doppler (TED) device for cardiac output (CO) monitoring (Accucom 2, Datascope), which displays aortic blood flow velocity in real time, was evaluated by 140 simultaneous comparisons with thermodilution (TD) in 16 patients early after coronary artery bypass surgery. The aim was to determine whether this technologic advancement improves the accuracy of COTED assessment. Absolute COTED values showed a considerable scatter as compared to COTD [COTED = 1.77 + 0.75.COTD (L/min), r = 0.52]. The bias, i.e., the mean of individual CO differences (COTD-COTED) was -0.37 +/- 1.70 L/min (SD). In contrast, relative CO changes (delta CO, % of preceding value) showed a satisfactory agreement between TED and TD [delta COTED = 1.04 + 0.91.delta COTD (%), r = 0.84, n = 124], the bias (delta COTD-delta COTED) being -0.66 +/- 9.72%. In 8 of 124 situations (6.45%), however, significant COTED changes opposite in direction to that of significant COTD changes occurred. This frequency was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than the ideal frequency of 0%. The agreement between delta COTD and delta COTED improved (P < 0.05) when the aortic diameter changes induced by changes in mean arterial pressure were considered [delta COTEDMAPC = 1.10 + 0.95.delta COTD (%), r = 0.87, n = 124]. Compared with previous results, the reliability of the second generation device to monitor relative CO changes was considerably improved. Provided that the aortic blood flow velocity signal was stable and free from any disturbances, the second generation TED device may be regarded acceptable for CO trend monitoring in sedated, paralyzed patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8214736     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transesophageal Doppler devices: A technical review.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; A G Aya; G Saïssi; M Dauzat; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Does increasing end-tidal carbon dioxide during laparoscopic cholecystectomy matter?

Authors:  M Kondoh; H Morisaki; T Yorozu; T Shigematsu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Paul M Dark; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The assessment of circulating volume using inferior vena cava collapse index and carotid Doppler velocity time integral in healthy volunteers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tom Peachey; Andrew Tang; Elinor C Baker; Jason Pott; Yonathan Freund; Tim Harris
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Equipment review: new techniques for cardiac output measurement--oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle using carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis.

Authors:  Christine Berton; Bernard Cholley
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.