Literature DB >> 8213910

Clarification of subtle reciprocal rearrangements using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

B A Sullivan1, J Leana-Cox, S Schwartz.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using chromosome-specific DNA libraries as painting probes was applied in the analysis of six subtle, balanced chromosome rearrangements. Both fresh and older slides, some of which had been previously G-banded, were used to determine if FISH could identify unambiguously very small amounts of translocated material. Our results indicate that this procedure can clearly and precisely distinguish the specific components of extremely subtle translocations, in different cell types, such as leukocytes, aminocytes, and chorionic villus, and irregardless of preparation age. This ability makes FISH a valuable tool in clinical cytogenetics for the confirmation of preliminary G-banded karyotypes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8213910     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  7 in total

1.  The Art and Applications of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Endocrine Pathology.

Authors:  George Kontogeorgos
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  FISHing chromosomes in endocrinology.

Authors:  G Kontogeorgos; K Kovacs
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Miller-Dieker syndrome resulting from rearrangement of a familial chromosome 17 inversion detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  H M Kingston; D H Ledbetter; P I Tomlin; K L Gaunt
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Familial complex chromosome rearrangement ascertained by in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  C Fuster; L Miguez; R Miró; M A Rigola; A Perez; J Egozcue
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Familial four breakpoint complex chromosomal rearrangement as a cause of monosomy 9p22-->pter and trisomy 10p11.2-->pter and 11q21 analysed by dual and triple colour FISH.

Authors:  P Stankiewicz; E Kostyk; E Bocian; H Stańczak; J Parczewska; E Piatkowska; T Mazurczak; J J Pietrzyk
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Molecular cytogenetic evidence for a common breakpoint in the largest inverted duplications of chromosome 15.

Authors:  A E Wandstrat; J Leana-Cox; L Jenkins; S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Impact of the human genome project on medical practice.

Authors:  B J Rossiter; C T Caskey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.